09-16-2013 06:41 AM - edited 03-16-2019 07:23 PM
Precursor: I am running 8.6(2) in a lab environment although the question can be applicable to UCM 6 and 7 as well)
Question for DLU assignment in UCM 8.6(2).
I have written some SQL queries against the UCM 8.6(2) Data Dictionary to understand DLU licensing assignments for registered devices.
run sql SELECT d.Name, d.Description, tc.name AS class, tm.name AS model, tu.units AS dlu
FROM Device AS d
JOIN typeclass AS tc ON d.tkclass = tc.enum
JOIN typemodel AS tm ON d.tkmodel = tm.enum
JOIN typelicenseunit AS tu ON tm.name = tu.name
WHERE tc.name IN ('Phone','Device Profile')
name description class model dlu
========================== ====================== ============ ============= ===
SEP0015C69F2838 CS Test Phone Phone Cisco 7940 4
SEP00152BA22966 SEP00152BA22966 Phone Cisco 7940 4
SEP000CCE73FF41 SEP000CCE73FF41 Phone Cisco 7940 4
SEPAB39EBF9DB00 SEPAB39EBF9DB00 Phone Cisco 7905 2
CIPC3 Agent5 Phone Cisco IP Communicator 3
CIPCDGAUTHIER-DP DP fo EM for CIPCDGAUTHIER Device Profile Cisco IPCommunicator 3
EM User Extension Mobility User Device Profile Cisco IP Communicator 3
CIPCDGAUTHIER CIPC for DGauthier Phone Cisco IP Communicator 3
SEP000C295F2938 Phone Cisco IP Communicator 3
As you can see above, the Device Profile for EM (Extension Mobility) appears to have 3 DLUs assigned...keep in mind that I have removed some of the entries to simplify my response. But, between Phones and Device Profiles allocated...I get a total of 78 license when I query via CLI.
When I go to the UCM, System, Licensing, License Unit Report, I only get 72 licenses allocated. Will state that the 78 vs 72 licenses have not association with Node licenses for Pub and Sub(s).
Can somebody add insight? It seems like an inconsistency the was UCM GUI reports on DLUs vs CLI license reporting...
Please advise...thx!
09-16-2013 07:32 AM
Hi,
As u have mentioned that query shows output for the endpoints/devices which are registered on call manager while the licensing report shows all devices which have been confiigured and are consuming licenses.
Do u have any phones which are configured but not registered at this point of time ?
regds,
aman
09-16-2013 07:37 AM
Yes...I have phone configured, but not registered at the moment. So would the un-registered phones contribute to the GUI via CLI license differences?
But what about device profiles? What I find interesting is that when Mobility is enabled, 2 or 4 DLU are allocated depending on Primary Device chosen in End User. Maybe this is apples and oranges...
thoughts?
09-16-2013 08:01 AM
Hi,
Yes, the configured but un-regsitered phones do consume licnese.You can try removing one of them and check.
Mobility end users do consume license.
regds,
aman
09-16-2013 11:30 AM
amanso,
Ok...did some clean up of users and devices and here is the what I found. If I query via CLI via the typeclass and typemodel...the CLI provides the types of classes and models with assigned DLUs. My lab UCM 8.6(2) currently has one (1) active DP + a Default Device Profile, each of which report 3 DLUs each. The remainder of the DLUs allocated are typeclass = Phone which results in 35 DLUs allocated.
So it is the 35 DLUs + Adjust DLU license, 2 DLUs assigned via Extension Mobility = total 37 DLU. this is is agreement with what UCM GUI, License Unit Report provides.
Therefore...the Device Profile, although shows as 3 DLUs...is not added to the 'burned' licenses. Regarding your early statement...DLU assignment is used when the device is created the first time and not whether the device is registered or unregistered state.
09-16-2013 11:32 AM
amanso,
sorry...fat fingered...
35 DLUs + Adjunct DLU license (2 DLUs assigned via Extension Mobility) for total DLU assignment = 37
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide