10-18-2018 10:53 AM - edited 03-17-2019 01:36 PM
Hi,
I recently switched our corporate remote workers from the old ASA phone proxy (I know - ancient) to MRA with Expressways using 88xx sets and Jabber mobile clients.
The jabber clients successfully get both UCM servers listed in their configurations, but all 88xx phones never get the Syand-by server populated in their configs. This creates a maintenance issue obviously since the publisher can never be OOS.
The Expressway-C definitely finds both nodes by name when querying the Publisher, but I have no clue why the Stand-by server entry never gets populated. The UCM group of the device pool has both listed and all other on-net phones get both.
I am unsure where to look as I have looked everywhere :)
Versions:
UCM - 10.5.2.17900-13
X-Way - X8.10.4
8845 - sip8845_65.12-0-1SR1-1
Anyone know what I am missing?
TiA!
-Greg
10-18-2018 12:37 PM
I believe there's still a limitation with MRA where phones and Jabber will not fail over to other CUCM nodes in case of primary CUCM node failure. This limitation is buried somewhere in a table in the Jabber Planning Guide and I wish it was mentioned in the Expressway MRA guide.
I read the workaround in case of primary CUCM failure is to change call manager groups in device pools so that a functioning CUCM is primary.
So the fact you don't see a standby CUCM may not be an issue because failover wouldn't work anyway.
10-18-2018 01:06 PM
I guess I'll dig through the docs more - you are correct, I just used the MRA doc :)
Just odd the jabber mobile clients have both nodes listed, but the phones do not. I guess I will learn to work around it :(
Thanks,
Greg
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide