Inbound POTs Translation to Internal Extension

[dnmosier7]

I am configuring a new location with a Cisco 2901 w/ 2 4-port FXO cards with 7 POTs lines.  I'm having problems setting the translation on the POTs lines to deliver to an internal extension.  Does anyone have any translation pattern/rules examples they can share?  Thank you for any help you can offer!

-Danielle

[Jaime Valencia]

Number Translation using Voice Translation  Profiles

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_configuration_example09186a00803f818a.shtml

Voice Translation Rules

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a0080325e8e.shtml

HTH

java

If this helps, please rate

www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

[Udit Mehrotra]

Inbound calls on FXO trunks never receive Called Party Number. The call is completed by just seizing the line and only one call is possible on one trunk.

If the FXO port is MGCP controlled then use "Attendant DN" on CUCM enfpoint page.

if this is H323/SIP gateway or CME use "connection plar" statement under voice-port config to route calls to appropriate extension.

HTH

Udit

[dnmosier7]

Udit,

Thank you for your response!  I realized that I hadn't included the "service mgcpapp" on my dial-peers. Once added, the calls are being routed correctly.

Do you know how or if it's possible to enable caller id on FXO ports using mgcp?  I know that it wasn't in the past; I'm hoping that I'm just not finding current information.

Thanks again!

-Danielle

[Logan Gaffney]

Caller ID on a MGCP controlled FXO port was not supported until CUCM 8.0.  Also, you need to watch out for bug CSCti49436 which was not fixed until 8.3.21005-1.  If you need to upgrade for this feature, I would suggest opening a TAC Service Request.