cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3206
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

IP phone 8961 + CKEM on third party Switch PoE only

Alexander Gomer
Level 1
Level 1

Hello Community,

 

may someone can answer my "simple" question.

Did anyone get Cisco IP Phone + CKEM running without addtional power cube for CKEM?

 

I'm using Extreme B5G124-48P2 which is 802.3AT compliant but only the phone get power not the expansion module.

 

Do I have to configure something on CUCM / Switch?

 

From Cisco data sheet it should work:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaboration-endpoints/unified-ip-color-key-expansion-module/data_sheet_c78-565427.html

>> Power Requirements
>> If the Cisco Unified IP Color Key Expansion Module is connected to a Cisco Unified IP Phone that uses 802.3AT power, a local power supply is not required. If the phone uses 802.3AF power, you must connect a power cube to it for it to supply power for all connected key expansion modules. If the phone is already locally powered by a power cube, no additional power cube is required when installing the key expansion module to it.

 

Thanks & Regards, Alexander

5 Replies 5

I couldn't find any specific info about how the power needed for the CKEM is negotiated so must be the phone with negotiate with the switch. With Cisco switch as far as I know CDP is used (by default unless you configure lldp)... did you configure LLDP on your third party Switch??

Is the module activated on phone config? Have you try it on a Cisco switch to check if its working ok ?

 

It's power negotiation activate on phone?

 

Power Negotiation Over LLDP

The phone and the switch negotiate the power that the phone consumes. Cisco IP Phone operates at multiple power settings, which lowers power consumption when less power is available.

After a phone reboots, the switch locks to one protocol (CDP or LLDP) for power negotiation. The switch locks to the first protocol (containing a power Threshold Limit Value [TLV]) that the phone transmits. If the system administrator disables that protocol on the phone, the phone cannot power up any accessories because the switch does not respond to power requests in the other protocol.

Cisco recommends that Power Negotiation always be enabled (default) when connecting to a switch that supports power negotiation.

If Power Negotiation is disabled, the switch may disconnect power to the phone. If the switch does not support power negotiation, disable the Power Negotiation feature before you power up accessories over PoE. When the Power Negotiation feature is disabled, the phone can power the accessories up to the maximum that the IEEE 802.3af-2003 standard allows.

 

As far as I understand If no power negotiation is made the maximum will be 802.3af-2003 so you should configure LLDP ( If you haven't already done) in switch and on phone config also enable LLDP...

 

Table 2 Key Expansion Module Power
 

Cisco IP Phone 8851

Cisco IP Phone 8861

Accessories

802.3af PoE

802.3at PoE

Cisco IP Phone Power Cube 4

802.3af PoE

802.3at PoE

Cisco IP Phone Power Cube 4

1 KEM

Supported

Supported

Supported

Not supported

Supported

Supported

 

 

Hope it helps, rate helpful and correct answers..

Lisandro

 

Hi Lisandro,

 

yes, LLDP is configured on switch and phone (through CUCM).

To be sure I'm disabled CDP, because Extreme Switches properitary handle CDP for Voice VLAN.

 

Module is active on phone config.

Power negotiation is active.

Did not tried on Cisco switch, yet.

 

CUCM CFG:

 

 

SWITCH CFG:

#ciscodp
set ciscodp port status disable ge.1.5

#port
set port inlinepower ge.1.5 priority critical

#lldp
set lldp port med-trap enable ge.1.5
set lldp port tx-tlv all ge.1.5

 

SWITCH DEBUG:

B5(su)->show lldp port remote-info ge.1.5
Local Port   : ge.1.5      Remote Port Id : 64D814A597X3:P1
----------------------
Port Desc    : SW PORT
Mgmt Addr    : 10.20.3.63
Chassis ID   : 10.20.3.63
Sys Name     : SEP64D814A597X3
Sys Desc     : Cisco IP Phone 9951, V1, sip9951.9-4-2-13
Sys Cap Supported/Enabled      : bridge,telephone/bridge,telephone


Network Policy
(app/tag/vlanId/cos/dscp)      : Voice/untagged/0/5/46
                                 Voice Signaling/untagged/0/4/32
Hardware Revision              : 1
Software Revision              : sip9951.9-4-2-13
Serial Number                  : XXXXXXXXX
Manufacturer                   : Cisco Systems, Inc.
Model Number                   : CP-9951
Asset Id                       :

 


B5(su)->show lldp port tx-tlv ge.1.5

* Means TLV is supported and enabled on this port
o Means TLV is supported on this port
  Means TLV is not supported on this port
Column Pro Id uses letter notation for enable: s-stp, l-lacp, g-gvrp

Ports    Port Sys  Sys  Sys Mgmt Vlan Pro  MAC PoE Link Max   MED MED MED MED
         Desc Name Desc Cap Addr Id   Id   PHY     Aggr Frame Cap Pol Loc PoE
-------  ---- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- --- --- ---- ----  --- --- --- ---
ge.1.5   *    *    *    *   *    *    slg  *   *   *    *     *   *   *   *

 


B5(su)->show port inlinepower ge.1.5
Port     Type                 Admin   Oper                Priority   Class   Power(W)  Capability  Power Select
-------  -----                ------  -----------------   --------   -----   --------  ----------  -------------
ge.1.5                        auto    Delivering Power    Critical   4       7.0       802.3at

 

 

PHONE LOG:

...

1932 WRN 00:00:37.171739  CDP-lldpProcessOrgSpecTLV(): Power TLV has incorrect length

...

1949 NOT 00:00:38.604805  DMAN(1502)-lkemHandler(): LKEM Detected

1950 NOT 00:00:38.605102  DMAN(1502)-isPowerAvailable(): Sending DM_CMD_REQ_POWER Requesting for 5000 power

1951 NOT 00:00:38.605513  PWRMAN-processPwrReq(): request in-process

1952 NOT 00:00:38.606052  PWRMAN-processPwrReq(): request in-process

1953 NOT 00:00:38.606562  PWRMAN-processPwrReq(): request in-process

1954 NOT 00:00:38.607013  DMAN(1502)-isPowerAvailable(): Response from PM: NO POWER

...

 

 

I created a wireshark trace, too.

But don't realy know where to look there.

 

Regards, Alexander

May it helps someone:

Extreme B5- Series do not Support it...

If anyone happens to come across this issue again, as I have, with a Ubiquiti USW-8-150W switch and the Cisco 8865 phone with the BEKEM module, the "Power Negotiation" setting is the key.

Disabling that and rebooting the phone made the expansion module power up and behave as expected.

So long as your switch can provide enough power, this seems to be an acceptable solution. The switch shows the port drawing 8.1W, with the phone in a video call, with the sidecar attached, which is well within what a POE+ capable switch can do.

Looks like the switch is not providing required power for the module. To Make sure the module is functional, try with a Cisco Switch..

I have my customers using 8851+Kem working on Cisco switches.

Second thing, From CUCM you must add the module on the phone.



Response Signature