Re: No busy tone with mobile connect

Support Albakom · ‎05-11-2011

hi,

we have an CUCM 7.1.3 with configured mobile connect. If someone calls the company number the mobile phone rings also. So it works fine.

Now the employee with the mobile phone calls someone in the company at the work phone. But the work phone is already in a call. So we expect, that the mobile user gets a busy tone, but he's got a ringtone instead. The Busy Trigger at all lines in the company is set to 1. It works, because if someone in the company calls someone other in the company from work phone to work phone and the called party is busy, the caller gets the busy tone.

how can I set, that the mobile caller gets also an busy tone?

pmvillarama · ‎05-16-2011

Hi,

May I ask if the actual internal IP Phone rings on its display screen when called tru mobile connect? How about when normal caller came from your PSTN trunk line?

pmvillarama · ‎05-16-2011

Hi,

You mentioned that all phones are configured in "busy trigger" to 1. How about the DN lines associated in their remote destination profiles? Could you check it and test?

please let us know how it goes.

- Paul

Support Albakom · ‎05-20-2011

Sorry for late answer:

> May I ask if the actual internal IP Phone rings on its display screen when called tru mobile connect? How about when normal caller came from your PSTN trunk line?

will try answer. If I call with my mobile phone , which is my Remote Destination, to a company work phone and there is busy, I dont get a busy, I get a ring tone. If some other calls from PSTN he gets a busy tone as expected.

> You mentioned that all phones are configured in "busy trigger" to 1. How about the DN lines associated in their remote destination profiles? Could you check it and test?

Already all DN are set "busy trigger" to 1.

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎11-30-2011

Hi

Have you been able to solve the issue?

We are facing the same issue with CUCM 8.0.3 and 8.6.2 when the remote destination calls in from an H.323 gateway to a busy IP phone. The mobile phone with the remote destination number just gets a ring tone (Q.931 Alerting) as if the IP phone would not be busy. If the same mobile phone is not configured as a remote destination and calls in to the busy IP phone, it will get a busy tone (Q931 Disconnect with reason "user busy").

Many thanks for your reply

Regards

Stefan

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎01-04-2012

Hi

I have opened a TAC service request for the problem and we have found a solution for the problem.

The problem is caused by the CUCM because it tries to provide the busy tone with the Annunciator which results in an ISDN Alerting message with Inband Info instead of a Disconnect message with cause "user busy".

If you configure a Media Resource Group List/Media Resource Group that does not contain an Annunciator and assign it to the Gateway config in CUCM, the Disconnect message with "user busy" will be sent out immediately and you should hear the busy tone on your mobile.

HTH

Stefan

armin.wagenfuehr · ‎01-12-2012

Hi Stefan, we are facing "nearly" the same issue. A mobile connect user get silent whe they call a busy IP Phone and after 29 seconds first a disconnect. A non mobile connect user get immediately a busy tone. The difference is, when a mobile connect user call a busy phone, CUCM send a progress with user busy, and with a non mobile connect user the CUCM send a immediately a disconnect. Please see below.

In our case your description not solve the issue. Have you any Idea?

Best Regards Armin

mobile connect user---------------------------------------------

000822: Jan 12 15:36:14.285: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x54D7

Sending Complete

Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3

Standard = CCITT

Transfer Capability = Speech

Transfer Mode = Circuit

Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

Channel ID i = 0xA18396

Preferred, Channel 22

Calling Party Number i = 0x2183, 'XXXXXXXXXXXXXX'

Plan:ISDN, Type:National

Called Party Number i = 0xC1, 'XXXXXX'

Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)

High Layer Compat i = 0x9181

000823: Jan 12 15:36:14.289: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Received SETUP callref = 0xD4D7 callID = 0x0029 switch = primary-net5 interface = User

tkvgw#

000824: Jan 12 15:36:14.313: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xD4D7

Channel ID i = 0xA98396

Exclusive, Channel 22

000825: Jan 12 15:36:14.337: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> PROGRESS pd = 8 callref = 0xD4D7

Cause i = 0x8191 - User busy

Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available

tkvgw#

000826: Jan 12 15:36:43.458: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x54D7

Cause i = 0x80E6 - Recovery on timer expiry

000827: Jan 12 15:36:43.466: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0xD4D7

000828: Jan 12 15:36:43.482: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x54D7

000829: Jan 12 15:36:43.686: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:18 disconnected from 3641456911 , call lasted 127 seconds

tkvgw#

000830: Jan 12 15:36:43.686: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xD4D3

Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing

000831: Jan 12 15:36:43.734: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x54D3

000832: Jan 12 15:36:43.738: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0xD4D3

non mobile connect user -----------------------------------------------------------

Jan 12 15:40:49.489: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x54DA

Sending Complete

Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3

Standard = CCITT

Transfer Capability = Speech

Transfer Mode = Circuit

Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

Channel ID i = 0xA18398

Preferred, Channel 24

Calling Party Number i = 0x2183, 'XXXXXXXXXXXXX'

Plan:ISDN, Type:National

Called Party Number i = 0xC1, 'XXXXXX'

Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)

High Layer Compat i = 0x9181

000864: Jan 12 15:40:49.489: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Received SETUP callref = 0xD4DA callID = 0x002C switch = primary-net5 interface = User

tkvgw#

000865: Jan 12 15:40:49.513: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xD4DA

Channel ID i = 0xA98398

Exclusive, Channel 24

000866: Jan 12 15:40:49.537: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xD4DA

Cause i = 0x8091 - User busy

000867: Jan 12 15:40:49.553: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x54DA

000868: Jan 12 15:40:49.557: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0xD4DA

tkvgw#

HTH, please rate all useful posts and right answers.

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎01-12-2012

Hi Armin

I guess there is still an "Annunciator" available for the gateway. Can you please verify your config again?

That you have a slightly different issue is probably dependent on your gateway config. Our gateway config converts the progress message from CUCM to an ISDN Alerting with In-Band Info.

Please check the other discussion I have started for this problem:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3503284#3503284

If there is really no Annunciator configured for the gateway in CUCM, you should trace the problem on CUCM. Maybe you'll find some Mobility messages like "CellProxy( 298): ccDisconnReq.cv = 17 set MobilityEvent = MOBILITY_EVENT_PLAY_ANNOUNCEMENT - active_CcDisconnReq" in the traces that could help you to find the cause.

That the call is disconnected after 30 seconds is caused by a T3XX timer expiry because the call did not get a Connect.

HTH

Stefan

armin.wagenfuehr · ‎01-13-2012

Hi Stefan, thank you for answer so fast! I have try both w/ and w/o MRG in MGRP Config and GW MGRP config, but not solve. Please see also attachment. You see if something is wrong in the screenshot?

HTH, please rate all useful posts and right answers.

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎01-13-2012

Hi Armin

Sorry, but I don't see any screenshots above.

You need to configure an explicit MRGL/MRG without an Annunciator in it. If you just unconfigure the MRGL in the gateway config then the gateway is using the default MRGL/MRG which most likely contains an Annunciator.

HTH

Stefan

mibrahim1986 · ‎08-30-2016

Hi guys,

we are experiencing a similar problem with a newer release of CUCM.

One question to this workarround.

What is the consequence of removing the Annunciator? Is this a solution for a productive environment?

Best Regards

Mohamed

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎08-30-2016

Hi Mohamed

We have seen that the issue with SNR no longer exists with SIP gateways and newer CUCM versions.

We have seen issues with no-ringback when the external calls are routed to Unity Connetion and then transfered to an internal subscriber. Otherwise there shouldn't be any bigger issues when you remove the annunciator from the gateway.

HTH

Stefan

mibrahim1986 · ‎08-30-2016

Hi Stefan,

thank you very much for your fast reply.

The strange thing is that we experience it with a 10.5.2.12901-1 release on h323 gateways.

We will try to remove the annunciator from the MRGL and MRG - maybe it helps.

Regars

Mohamed

mibrahim1986 · ‎08-31-2016

It helped - strange that it seems not to be fixed in our CUCM 10.5 Version.

STEFAN CHRISTEN · ‎08-31-2016

Maybe it's SIP to the gateway that fixes the issue