12-05-2013 08:57 AM - edited 03-16-2019 08:43 PM
We have a CUCM 8.6 environment, with a couple different cube gateways with various SIP trunks.
For normal operations we have a partition that points to a route list/group that lists our gateways in the correct order.
However for testing I would like to be able to force a call out our secondary gateway. What's the best way to set that up?
I could create a route pattern for a specific external DID, and point that to a different route group?
Or could I put a single device (test phone) in a different partition so all calls from that phone go out via a different route group?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-05-2013 09:22 AM
Create seperate Route Group, Route List, set of Route Patterns in test parition, assigned that PT to test CSS, and assign that CSS to your test phone.
HTH,
Chris
12-05-2013 01:40 PM
Make sure the domain matches what is on the GW and what is on CUCM GW. Also, try issuing "no mgcp", "mgcp". But your best option would be to ditch MGCP and use SIP instead as MGCP is known for chronic issues such as this.
HTH,
Chris
12-05-2013 09:22 AM
Create seperate Route Group, Route List, set of Route Patterns in test parition, assigned that PT to test CSS, and assign that CSS to your test phone.
HTH,
Chris
12-05-2013 11:05 AM
That process worked perfectly, thank you.
I was able to individually test all my CUBE routers with SIP trunks.
However I was unable to test my outbound PRIs.
When I place the PRI gw first in my route list, it doesn't use it...the call goes through the SIP routers.
Any ideas? Any debug commands I could use on my PRI gw to see if that's why it was failing?
12-05-2013 11:13 AM
Provide "debug isdn q931" and "debug voice dialpeer" from the PRI GW?
What protocol are you using to control it from CUCM?
Chris
12-05-2013 11:23 AM
No output from the debug commands, so I think it isn't even trying that gateway, despite it being first in the RL.
Protocol is MGCP
I also ran a Dialed Number Analyzer, and confirmed it should be using the PRI GW.
12-05-2013 11:32 AM
Is the PRI port showing registered? Can you provide "sh ccm-manager" output from the GW?
Chris
12-05-2013 11:44 AM
Yep thanks that's the problem, the GW is not registering...
sh ccm-manager
MGCP Domain Name: PRIGW01
Priority Status Host
============================================================
Primary Backup Ready 10.10.22.5
First Backup Registering with CM 10.20.22.5
Current active Call Manager: None
Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428
Failover Interval: 30 seconds
Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds
Last keepalive sent: 15:48:41 EST Jun 24 2013 (elapsed time: 7w0d)
Last MGCP traffic time: 14:34:58 EST Dec 5 2013 (elapsed time: 00:00:18)
Last failover time: 14:34:58 EST Dec 5 2013 from (10.60.227.7)
Last switchback time: 14:34:28 EST Dec 5 2013 from (10.50.227.7)
Switchback mode: Graceful
MGCP Fallback mode: Not Selected
Last MGCP Fallback start time: None
Last MGCP Fallback end time: None
MGCP Download Tones: Disabled
TFTP retry count to shut Ports: 2
Backhaul Link info:
Link Protocol: TCP
Remote Port Number: 2428
Remote IP Address: 10.10.22.5
Current Link State: OPEN
Statistics:
Packets recvd: 0
Recv failures: 0
Packets xmitted: 0
Xmit failures: 0
PRI Ports being backhauled:
Slot 0, VIC 1, port 0
Slot 0, VIC 0, port 0
FAX mode: cisco
Configuration Error History:
12-05-2013 01:40 PM
Make sure the domain matches what is on the GW and what is on CUCM GW. Also, try issuing "no mgcp", "mgcp". But your best option would be to ditch MGCP and use SIP instead as MGCP is known for chronic issues such as this.
HTH,
Chris
12-05-2013 09:40 PM
Thanks, the no mgcp/mgcp fixed it.
I'll consider a move to SIP.
Thanks very much for all the help
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide