05-23-2012 11:07 PM
Hi all,
would someone can tell me how to configurate dynamic load balance on two VRF in a physical MPLS link?
Topology:
HQ(3845)-----------MPLS link(2M)-----------Branch(2811)
Scene:
there a MPLS VPN link between HQ and Branch, we want to set up two VRF on this MPLS link, one is VRF-internal, another is VRF-guest, and two VRF share with 2M, can we dynamic load balance on both VRF? but VRF-internal have high priority.
Thanks
Ben
05-25-2012 03:43 AM
Hi,
Can you elaborate more on what is needed.
Is it like you have one physical link from HQ to provider (same setup at branch) and you want it split into two vrf's and then
load share between these two vrf's ?
Regards # Mahesh
06-05-2012 01:33 AM
Hi Mahesh,
thanks a lot for your reply, you are right, is there any good suggestion and example configuration? and if do this, it mean there is a PE router in client network? because VRF can't be configure in CE Router? is this right?
thanks
Ben
06-05-2012 01:49 AM
you can acheive by using vrf lite at customer end or create two sub interface one for internal and one for guest and corresponding different vrf will be terminated at PE router.
HQ(3845)---vrf lite a,b(vlan10,20)----vrf a,b(vlan10,20)----MPLS link(2M)-----------Branch(2811)
HQ(3845)---(vlan10,20)----vrf a,b(vlan10,20)----MPLS link(2M)-----------Branch(2811)
regards
Shivlu Jain
06-05-2012 02:15 AM
HI Shivlu Jain,
thanks for your support, I am a learner on MPLS, Would you show me some simple example configuration(include 3845,2811 and both PE of service provider). and can we dynamic load balance on both VRF or sub interface with some QOS?
maybe the topology need change to below?
HQ3845(vrf lite a,b(vlan10,20)----PE1 (vrf a,b(vlan10,20))----MPLS link(2M)-----------PE2 (vrf a,b(vlan10,20))——--Branch2811(vrf lite a,b(vlan10,20))
or
HQ3845(vlan10,20)----PE1 (vrf a,b(vlan10,20))----MPLS link(2M)-----------PE2(vrf a,b(vlan10,20))——Branch2811(vlan10,20)
06-06-2012 12:41 AM
is below topology available for this requirement?
CE1(VRF-lite Guest on tunnel 0, VRF-lite-Employee on tunne1)——MPLS——CE2(VRF-lite Guest on tunnel 0, VRF-lite-Employee on tunne1)
because local SP don't accept make any change on PE router.
06-21-2012 11:23 AM
Hi.
How are you today?
I looked at this topic only today, and I had a doubt.
I have two mpls links and want to do load balancing between the two links.
You say you can not change the settings of routers feet, this is correct ... but how can I ensure that the packets passed through the MPLS cloud and arrived at the destination if they go by different routes or the PEs are not the same, my SP will not know what I'm doing this.
My Local network ----- PE Router ----- cloud mpls ------ Router PE ----- My site network
By understanding, I need lith VRFs on my local network. this is correct?
06-21-2012 11:27 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide