03-28-2020 05:59 AM
Dear all,
I would like to ask you whether this is a valid MPLS Core design with two RRs, also should the two RRs include MPLS configuration as well?
Thank you in advance for all comments and suggestions.
03-28-2020 10:29 AM - edited 03-28-2020 10:32 AM
For control-only RRs you don't need any mpls configuration on RRs. Just make sure routes being learned can do next-hop resolution. This can be achieved by adding less specific route(s) to next-hops pointing to null0.
HTH.
03-28-2020 10:58 AM
Any design with more Resiliance or High Availability is Valid,
there is good document unified MPLS for reference :
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: