MPLS Core Design

[AdamKudela]

Dear all,

I would like to ask you whether this is a valid MPLS Core design with two RRs, also should the two RRs include MPLS configuration as well?

Thank you in advance for all comments and suggestions.

[rais]

For control-only RRs you don't need any mpls configuration on RRs. Just make sure routes being learned can do next-hop resolution. This can be achieved by adding less specific route(s) to next-hops pointing to null0.

HTH.

[balaji.bandi]

Any design with more Resiliance or High Availability is Valid, 

there is good document unified MPLS for reference :

https://community.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-documents/unified-mpls-for-mobile-transport-3-0-design-guide/ta-p/3647912