cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1141
Views
14
Helpful
5
Replies

MPLS LDP label advertisement

g.rodegari
Level 1
Level 1

Hi all,

please consider this network:

|R1|------|R2|-------|R3|

three router, in a point-to-point scenario with any IGP, MPLS and LDP.

R1 has 2 routes in routing table and, by default, advertise thorugh LDP a label-3 for both two prefix (PHP).

In my experience, I know, that R2 advertise the two prefix with 2 different label. Am I correct?

Than R3 has 2 LSP to reach two networks that actually follow the same path...

Is it possible to configure R2 to advertise both network with the same label value?

Thank you

And Kind Regards,

Graz.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Harold Ritter
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

LDP allocates one label for each and every prefix in the RIB (except for BGP routes). The only way to heve one label allocated for the two routes in your case would be to advertise them as one aggregated route if possible.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

Harold Ritter
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

LDP allocates one label for each and every prefix in the RIB (except for BGP routes). The only way to heve one label allocated for the two routes in your case would be to advertise them as one aggregated route if possible.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Thank you Harold,

in my opinion is a pretty strange behaviour...

but does not matter.

Regards,

Graz.

Hmmmm, Harold, using MPLS static labels, would it be possible to assign the same label to more than one prefix?

IOS will not let you use the same label to different prefixes (FEC). Why bother anyway and not just let LDP alocate 1 label per prefix. The label space is large enough to accomodate even the largest IGP I have come across.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

It doesn't seem strange to me that if these two prefixes are considered independent from one another from a routing point of view that they each get assigned a different LSP. What if prefix 1 and prefix 2 shared the same LSP but all of a sudden they are not preferred via the same egress LSR.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México