- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2009 04:54 AM
Hi All,
I noticed a really unusual thing. When multipath is enabled between eBGP and iBGP, the AD of iBGP path also appears as 20 instead of 200. However, if eBGP path is not available and only iBGP path is available, the AD becomes 200.
This seems like a bug. Any ideas?
Here's the sample output- Notice network 10.2.2.0 in the both outputs.
PE1#sh ip route vrf CUST1
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.64.0.0/30 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 172.64.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
B 172.64.2.0 is directly connected, 00:22:35, Serial0/1
B 172.64.3.0 [200/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:04:33
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B 10.2.2.0 [20/0] via 172.64.2.1 (CUST2), 00:22:35
[20/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:00:27
B 10.1.1.0 [20/0] via 172.64.1.1, 00:22:45
PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.2.2.0
BGP routing table entry for 1:1:10.2.2.0/24, version 24
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table CUST1)
Multipath: eiBGP
Flag: 0x800
Advertised to update-groups:
1
65002, imported path from 2:2:10.2.2.0/24
2.2.2.2 (metric 11) from 2.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, multipath
Extended Community: RT:2:2
mpls labels in/out nolabel/20
65002, imported path from 1:2:10.2.2.0/24
172.64.2.1 from 172.64.2.1 (10.2.2.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, multipath, best
Extended Community: RT:1:2
Regards,
Amit.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
MPLS
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2009 09:55 AM
Hello Amit,
I don't think it is a bug.
you have asked to perform iBGP and eBGP multipath if the iBGP prefix would be presented with natural AD 200 it wouldn't be installed in routing table and you would see only the eBGP path coming from CE node.
it is a way to fool IP routing table mantainer
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2009 06:06 AM
Hi Amit
Please post the diagram.
regards
shivlu jain
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2009 09:55 AM
Hello Amit,
I don't think it is a bug.
you have asked to perform iBGP and eBGP multipath if the iBGP prefix would be presented with natural AD 200 it wouldn't be installed in routing table and you would see only the eBGP path coming from CE node.
it is a way to fool IP routing table mantainer
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2009 02:39 PM
@Giuseppe- I have to agree with you. To support your claim, when I made the eBGP route unavailable, the routing table stored the iBGP path with correct AD i.e. 200.
@shivlu- Here's the implementation mate.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2009 01:28 AM
Amit You are right. I need to simulate the same and will come back with results.
Could you post the IOS name.
regards
shivlu jain
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2009 04:02 AM
Hi Shivlu,
I tried on c2691-spservicesk9-mz.124-25a.bin.
Regards,
Amit.
