12-27-2017 10:04 PM - edited 03-01-2019 06:19 PM
I have two switches
1-Juniper
2-Cisco SG300
My requirement is in juniper side i will use SFP module and Cisco side also ,but both are different vendor
so how i will configure that port.
I did
1-Both side "trunk"
2-Set Full duplex
3-Allowed all vlan in both switches
After that they are not communicate with each other so i need help
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-29-2017 02:38 AM - edited 12-29-2017 02:39 AM
Hello,
In common there is no issue to connect different switches from different vendors by optics (via SFP or SFP+) as long as they support same physical conditions (wavelength and so on). You can check Cisco SFP / SFP+ Data Sheet here:
Also, during trunk auto-negotiation process switches may fail to form a trunk link because of vendor issues, so I would rather disable this auto-negotiation with switchport nonegotiate . Also as per Cisco best practice manual speed and duplex should be defined on ports to achieve maximum and predictable performance.
However you need to ensure that:
- Both switches are using same STP mode
- Both switches have their ports configured as trunks
- Both switches have same VLAN IDs configured
- Both switches have same native VLAN ID
I would go with the following configuration on Cisco switch:
interface X/X/X
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan X
switchport nonegotiate
speed X
duplex full
switchport trunk encapsulation dot11q
Last command may not be applicable to your switch due to Cisco has depreciated ISL trunking and stick to dot11q encapsulation as default and only one available option.
Also after you see that traffic can pass between this two devices I would monitor situation a bit with show interface X/X command to ensure that there is no errors or CRC.
12-28-2017 06:36 AM
Did you use dot1q encapsulation on the cisco switch?
12-29-2017 02:38 AM - edited 12-29-2017 02:39 AM
Hello,
In common there is no issue to connect different switches from different vendors by optics (via SFP or SFP+) as long as they support same physical conditions (wavelength and so on). You can check Cisco SFP / SFP+ Data Sheet here:
Also, during trunk auto-negotiation process switches may fail to form a trunk link because of vendor issues, so I would rather disable this auto-negotiation with switchport nonegotiate . Also as per Cisco best practice manual speed and duplex should be defined on ports to achieve maximum and predictable performance.
However you need to ensure that:
- Both switches are using same STP mode
- Both switches have their ports configured as trunks
- Both switches have same VLAN IDs configured
- Both switches have same native VLAN ID
I would go with the following configuration on Cisco switch:
interface X/X/X
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan X
switchport nonegotiate
speed X
duplex full
switchport trunk encapsulation dot11q
Last command may not be applicable to your switch due to Cisco has depreciated ISL trunking and stick to dot11q encapsulation as default and only one available option.
Also after you see that traffic can pass between this two devices I would monitor situation a bit with show interface X/X command to ensure that there is no errors or CRC.
06-14-2018 12:44 PM
We work with AE Agregated Ethernet Links in LACP Active in Juniper side and
In cisco side port channel LACP Active, media typ sfp, without auto-negotiation.
We use two links for redundancy,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide