07-16-2021 06:43 AM
Hi,
Just wondering if there is any downside to using the ITLRecorvery cert for enabling SSO? Does this involve pushing out the ITLRecovery Cert to all PC endpoints?
As Companies are all only signing internal certs for 1 year now - it creates a bit of overhead having to re-do the SSO agreement every year for multiple customers
As the ITLRecovery it valid for 15 years or so this would avoid that I assume?
Thoughts?
07-16-2021 07:27 AM - edited 07-16-2021 08:07 AM
For SSO we use tomcat. ITLrecovery is used for signing ITL/CTL.
I recently signed my UC server with valid of 3 years and I face no issues but not for SSO.
Public signed CA certs are for one year.
07-16-2021 07:31 AM
07-16-2021 08:38 AM - edited 07-16-2021 08:42 AM
I believe Thats a new enhancement, on my 12.5(1) version it never mentioned ITL recovery. Never did SSO on SU4 so didn't notice this change.
When talking about Self signed we consider its a least secure certificate. And some organisation doesn't show interest in using self signed certs.
Both self signed and CA signed works if you do it correctly.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide