06-30-2004 05:43 AM - edited 03-02-2019 04:44 PM
Can you help me i got with the slow connection, I have a router in our head office and another one in the warehouse now whem it try to have a continous pinging I get a result sometimes a timeout request. My location is in the head office..and I am trying to access the warehouse but it is too slow..
The leased line bandwidth is 128kbps but still i could not make it work fast enough..The following configuration I made:
Head Office:
User Access Verification
Password:
kudu-hq>en
Password:
kudu-hq#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 810 bytes
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname kudu-hq
!
enable secret xxxxx
enable password xxxxx
!
username xxxx password xxx
username xxxx password xxxx
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
ip cef
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.10.1.3 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.0.3 255.255.255.0
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
ip address 172.17.17.1 255.255.255.252
no fair-queue
!
interface Serial1
no ip address
shutdown
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.17.2
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252 172.17.17.2
no ip http server
!
access-list 101 permit ip any any
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password
login
!
no scheduler allocate
!
end
Warehouse:
User Access Verification
Password:
kudu-wh>en
Password:
Password:
kudu-wh#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 709 bytes
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname kudu-wh
!
enable secret xxxxx
!
username xxxx password xxxx
username xxxx password xxxx
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
ip address 172.17.17.2 255.255.255.252
no fair-queue
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.17.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.252 172.17.17.1
no ip http server
!
access-list 101 permit ip any any
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password
login
!
!
end
Please feeback on this I could not find the solution on this problem..Is there any problem with my configuration?
Please advise..
06-30-2004 06:18 AM
06-30-2004 06:35 AM
This is the result when i used show interface serial 0 for the warehouse router, below is the status I get:
kudu-wh#show int s0
Serial0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial
Internet address is 172.17.17.2/30
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 20/255, rxload 20/255
Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 2359
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 125000 bits/sec, 75 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 124000 bits/sec, 75 packets/sec
15973690 packets input, 2313524274 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 144345 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
4228 input errors, 1115 CRC, 1725 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 1387 abort
15980228 packets output, 2236552237 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 15 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
8 carrier transitions
DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
When i try to ping it i got an average of speed of 600 to 700 ms which i think it is not ok with 128 kbps leased line connection..
Is there any problem with my router configuration?
Thanks for your immdiate response..
06-30-2004 08:28 AM
Ok one thing I would do is to add the bandwidth 128 command to both of those interfaces. Then do a clear counters on both routers. I would then check to see if your input errors or CRC's go up at that point, I don't think there is a problem there because the reliability of the link is 255/255. I am guessing that after you change the bandwidth command you are going to see the load on the interface go up a lot higher which suggests that it is over utilized. You can see under the 5 minute input and output rate that they are at 125000bps and 124000bps respectfully which is your maximum bandwidth. The reason you are getting such high latency times is because the router is overutilized. There is obviously someone or some application that is taking up all the bandwidth.
Jason Smith
07-02-2004 10:36 PM
Hi,
Ok, we use the connection for an application connected from the Head Office accessed by the warehouse..I already put the 128 commands on both interface..About the application it is a JAVA applet that is running the Warehouse System Utility..
Any updates on this I will advise you..
Thanks for the info..
07-04-2004 12:12 AM
Hi,
Thanks for the information that you gave but I change my configuration to use the Router Rip version and configured both three networks for the Warehouse router and Head office router. Below are the lines I add in order to have a better performance:
Warehouse router:
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.1.0
network 10.10.0.0
network 172.17.17.0
Remove ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.17.1
Note: This configuration makes the router very slow
Head Office router:
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.0.0
network 10.10.1.0
network 172.17.17.0
Remove ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.17.1
Note: This configuration makes the router very slow
Now it is ok thanks also, I based it on another discussion thread in order for this to solved..
06-30-2004 06:21 PM
Hi,
I don't understand the state route configuration in
your router:
headoffice:
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252 172.17.17.2
Warehouse:
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.252 172.17.17.1
Are U sure the subnet assigned is right?
^-^
07-01-2004 07:02 AM
Yeah the route statements are messed up but there is a default route on each one pointing to the other which makes it work. I would just get rid of the two statements above or better yet, run a routing protocol.
07-02-2004 10:44 PM
This is the subnet that was given by our ISP and i think they should know about this..Any way as per your analization of the configuration can you send me a configuration that would fits our setup..
Please advise me on this thanks..
07-01-2004 08:11 AM
My suggestion is that you Fix the Fastehernet port 100/ FUll or 10/full according to the Switch Port or Hub Port.
07-02-2004 10:50 PM
Can you elaborate no this I could not understand..
07-05-2004 01:13 PM
Do this:-
1.Remove the dodgy routes.
2.Configure Weighted Fair Queueing on the 128k serial interfaces -its always a good starter.
3.Why try to run RIP on a simple point to pint link-your just adding to the circuit overhead ?
4.As already mentioned -Nail up your ethernet port speed to match the LAN hub or switch
Try something like
!
hostname kudu-hq
!
etc
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.10.1.3 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.0.3 255.255.255.0
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
bandwidth 128
ip address 172.17.17.1 255.255.255.252
fair-queue
!
!
ip classless
ip route 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.2
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252 172.17.17.2
no ip http server
!
etc
hostname kudu-wh
!
etc
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
bandwidth 128
ip address 172.17.17.2 255.255.255.252
fair-queue
!
ip classless
ip route 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.1
no ip http server
!
etc
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide