12-23-2020 02:13 PM
Hi all, I am wandering, if the worry is having to many BGP Sessions on Router A, is there are any difference between the following 2 scenarios? If there are no differences, is there a BGP feature that helps overcoming this problem?
Scenario 1:
Scenario 2:
Thanks in advance for any help
Davide
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-24-2020 04:32 AM
Hello,
since these are all eBGP session, the only thing I could think of are peer groups. Route Reflectors and Confederations won't help (and work), since there is no need for a full mesh in eBGP.
12-23-2020 03:34 PM
Vpnv4 is better
config one bgp between routers and inject vrf route
12-24-2020 02:14 AM
If the peers are many suggested to use RR ( Route Reflector) for redundancy. with BGP vpnv4
example : vpnv4
12-24-2020 03:35 AM
Thanks, the fact is that routers B,C,D will have eBGP sessions with router A, that's why I was wondering if there are any similar features like Route Reflector to use for eBGP.
Many thanks
David
12-24-2020 04:08 AM
Router A is your control, you can also look templates.
12-24-2020 04:32 AM
Hello,
since these are all eBGP session, the only thing I could think of are peer groups. Route Reflectors and Confederations won't help (and work), since there is no need for a full mesh in eBGP.
12-24-2020 08:37 AM
Many thanks Georg, very helpful
Davide
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide