cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1070
Views
0
Helpful
7
Replies

Can you run VRRP with only one router on a 4451-X?

bhallman
Level 1
Level 1

Is it possible to use VRRP with 2 different interfaces on the same router? The hope is to use 1 4451-X with 2 interfaces going to a switch stack so that if a link fails the VRRP will allow the traffic to use the other interface elsewhere in the stack.

7 Replies 7

rais
Level 7
Level 7

You can use SVI IP address instead.

HTH

Francesco Molino
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni
Hi

If you connect your router to a stack using 2 physical links, then just do a routed port-channel (L3).
And if 1 link goes down, the traffic will flow on the remaining link. If both are up, load balancing algorithm will be charge to make traffic using both links.

To do vrrp, it means you'll have 2 interfaces on the same router within the same subnet and the router won't allow you to do such config.

Thanks
Francesco
PS: Please don't forget to rate and select as validated answer if this answered your question

nazimkha
Level 4
Level 4
you can use a simple port-channel between the 4451-X and the stack switches

JimBrownSr1970
Level 1
Level 1

You can create a separate VRF for each interface & create the VRRP groups as needed. This is a *very* basic example & just off the top of my head.

Ex:
vrf definition Site1
 address-family ipv4
!
vrf definition Site2
 address-family ipv4
!
interface Gig0/0/1
 vrf forwarding Site1
 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
 vrrp 1 ip 192.168.1.1
 vrrp 1 priority 110
!
interface Gig0/0/2
 vrf forwarding Site2
 ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
 vrrp 1 ip 192.168.1.1

Hello!

As other noted you should use port-channel. Using two L3 interfaces you will have to setup routing and wont be able to use them both at the same time.

BR

****Kindly rate all useful posts*****

Stack can have two port in two different SW within same PortChannel 

And hence you can config ISR portchannel using two interface with mode ON toward two different SW of stack.

I Prefer make it L3 portchannel not l2 and config SVI 

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

As others have already noted, using a Etherchannel (MEC on the switch side) would normally be the preferred approach.

Many Cisco ISRs supported a manual Etherchannel but I recall (?) reading, on these forums, later ISRs might now support LACP.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card