01-08-2008 02:57 AM - edited 03-03-2019 08:10 PM
from 10.209.19.234 next hop 10.209.19.235 to 10.209.19.51 can ping.
from 10.209.19.234 next hop 10.209.19.235 to 10.209.19.65 cannot ping, why?
pls. see attachment drawing ....thanks!
01-08-2008 03:18 AM
Do you have route for the subnet 10.209.19.65 on the router with IP 10.203.19.234?
can you post the routing table from both the routers
Narayan
01-09-2008 10:39 PM
yes i do have route...i did a traceroute from 10.203.19.234 to 10.203.19.65 and it stops at 6506 switch. I add a static route with vlan3 as my next hop and it works. Do I really need to add static routes on the switch? or can I just enable dynamic routing protocol (e.g. rip) on the switch? Pls. advice....thanks!
01-09-2008 11:31 PM
From your post i understand u dont have route on core switch to the subnet to which host .65 is connected. So u nned to add a route.Running a protocol is entirely your choice.
01-10-2008 06:26 PM
thanks, can you give me a link for example configuration using dynamic protocol on a switch...
01-08-2008 03:25 AM
check for any sort of filtering via access list...
check for route entry for subnet of 10.209.19.65..
01-08-2008 06:04 AM
This may be a stupid question, but is the interface up?
Can you ping the IP from the switch connected to that interface?
Can you do a traceroute to the IP and see where it dies at, then on the router where the .19.65 address is at do a debug icmp trace and capture the icmp to see if there is any ack back?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide