02-03-2010 01:47 AM - edited 03-04-2019 07:23 AM
Hello, I have som performances issues with a GRE Tunnel on 4500 (12.2(37)SG with Supervisor V).
I think that GRE Tunnel is performed on SW, isn't ?
Does someone know the max throughput that we can get on that tunnel ?
I'm afraid that fragmentation can also decrease the performances, ho can I check the number of fragmented packet on that tunnel ?
02-03-2010 07:10 AM
hi,
Its true that GRE packets are process switched in 4500 series switches running with any codes i.e Switched in software. I think it will give you performance between 5 to 15 Mbps at max. It may also lead to high CPU utilization during the specified data rates.
HTH
Hitesh Vinzoda
02-03-2010 01:00 PM
Hello Helenio,
use of GRE tunnels on a Cisco 4500 is not recommended it would lead to very high cpu usage with rather poor performances.
We also noticed that is not possible to move traffic in a VRF using a GRE tunnel in VRF.
What is your scenario?
Hope to help
Giuseppe
02-03-2010 11:12 PM
I'm using GRE tunnel cause I have to set up a EIGRP comunication over VPN-IPsec (2x Fortigate FWs). I did a test and I had 70% CPU with 40 Mbps traffic.
Do you see another way to establish a EIGRP Neighborship trhough a VPN IPsec Tunnel ?
For the VRF you mean that you can't assign a Tunnel to a VRF other that the Global one ?
02-03-2010 11:59 PM
As Giuseppe mentioned above, you must use router not switches for tunnels.
02-04-2010 05:01 AM
Where can I fing Tunnel performances based on RTR Model ?
02-04-2010 05:21 AM
02-04-2010 05:42 AM
Thank's ... Tunnel GRE in Routers is done in Fast/CEF ? ...
02-04-2010 09:15 AM
Hello Helenio,
yes sw based routers have no dramatic performance penalties when handling GRE tunnels.
CEF for tunnel GRE should be supported in recent IOS releases
Hope to help
Giuseppe
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide