01-03-2008 07:09 PM - edited 03-03-2019 08:07 PM
I have a cisco 2610 with a WIC1-ADSL card, and the c2600-is4-mz version of IOS installed...
...My problem, I do believe, is in configuration. If I show interface adsl 0/0, it shows that there are packets being sent and received. On the BVI1 interface, they're only being outputted. I'm using Embarq (sprint) DSL, and they told me to use 8/35 for my vpi and vci...I have a static IP. What am I doing wrong? I can't ping the gateway from my router...?
--scott
01-04-2008 04:12 PM
Hi,
please try:
interface ATM0/0
no bundle-enable
no bridge-group 1
no pvc 8/35
interface ATM0/0.1 point-to-point
bridge-group 1
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!
01-05-2008 02:29 AM
I am not sure I understand why you need a BVI to accomplish your goal here.... you don't have any other interfaces in the bridge group to receive L2 packets.
Nothing is actually being bridged here, so you could probably just throw the ip configuration and the nat on the subint and get going!
NS
01-05-2008 05:02 AM
Hi NS,
Well, I'm nor sure about Embarq (sprint) DSL, but many ISPs use bridged rfc1483 encapsulation for their service, so that is the reason for the BVI and the suggest configuration.
The reason why they to that, is because when the CPE is a "dumb" modem/bridge, a PC directly connected via ethernet will work with either rfc1483 bridged or PPPoE encapsulation, but it would not work with rfc1483 routed encap.
01-05-2008 11:23 AM
I configured my old dsl 'modem' to use rfc1483...but I thought that was covered when I set the encapsulation to aal5snap in the pvc 8/35 within the atm 0/0...
01-05-2008 11:49 AM
Does it work with the config changes I suggested ?
The thing is that you have to use point-to-point interfaces for rfc1483, and the main ATM it is point-to-multipoint instead. So the need for a subinterface.
01-05-2008 02:14 PM
I did give that a try, simply executing those commands on top of the posted config...I would like to try it with a clean config, though. Now, I got the drift that you left the bvi in place and bridged it to the atm0/0.1, yes?
--scott
01-05-2008 02:34 PM
Yes. Pasting the lines should have been enough. May be they have routed encap, as NS incidentally suggested.
To try that, remove bridging, and configure IP directly under atm0/0.1
01-05-2008 03:09 PM
I'll try that with a fresh configuration right now. I did find, on google, someone configuring one of sprint's (who is now embarq) dsl modems as follows. It mentions encap;
DHCP= Server
Client IP Pool Starting Address= 192.168.1.2
Size of Client IP Pool= 1
Primary DNS Server= (supplied by Sprint) (204.x.x.10)
Secondary DNS Server= (supplied by Sprint) (199.x.x.10)
Remote DHCP Server= N/A
TCP/IP Setup:
IP Address= 192.168.1.1
IP Subnet Mask= 255.255.255.252
RIP Direction= Both
Version= RIP-1
Multicast= None
IP Policies=
Edit IP Alias= No
ISP's Name= MyISP
Encapsulation= ENET ENCAP
Multiplexing= LLC-based
VPI #= 8 (Assigned by Sprint)
VCI #= 35 (Assigned by Sprint)
Service Name= N/A
My Login= N/A
My Password= N/A
Single User Account= Yes
IP Address Assignment= Static
IP Address= (assigned by Sprint)
ENET ENCAP Gateway= (assigned by Sprint)
01-05-2008 04:02 PM
alright, I tried a fresh configuration, and I attached it. I still can't ping my next hop, but both the atm interfaces are transferring packets. Here are the show interfaces:
CNRouter#show interfaces ATM 0/0
ATM0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is DSLSAR (with Alcatel ADSL Module)
MTU 4470 bytes, sub MTU 4470, BW 448 Kbit, DLY 4570 usec,
reliability 210/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ATM, loopback not set
Encapsulation(s): AAL5 AAL2, PVC mode
23 maximum active VCs, 256 VCs per VP, 1 current VCCs
VC Auto Creation Disabled.
VC idle disconnect time: 300 seconds
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:47, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: Per VC Queueing
5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
1607 packets input, 188486 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 994 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
7 packets output, 596 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
CNRouter#show interfaces ATM 0/0.1
ATM0/0.1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is DSLSAR (with Alcatel ADSL Module)
Internet address is 65.41.113.117/24
MTU 4470 bytes, BW 448 Kbit, DLY 4570 usec,
reliability 216/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ATM
1734 packets input, 201766 bytes
7 packets output, 596 bytes
0 OAM cells input, 0 OAM cells output
AAL5 CRC errors : 0
AAL5 SAR Timeouts : 0
AAL5 Oversized SDUs : 0
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Here is the running-config:
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname CNRouter
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip cef
!
!
ip name-server 65.41.112.28
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.99
!
ip dhcp pool cnpool
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
dns-server 65.41.112.28
netbios-name-server 192.168.1.6
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface ATM0/0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode auto
!
interface ATM0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 65.41.113.117 255.255.255.0
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
!
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 192.168.1.99 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
full-duplex
!
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
shutdown
!
no ip http server
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 65.41.113.1
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login local
!
!
end
01-05-2008 04:39 PM
Make sure you're pinging from the ATM interface... you don't have enough configuration for your nat to work at this point. :-)
NS
01-05-2008 05:16 PM
I put ip nat outside on the ATM0/0.1 interface, now what else do I have to do to configure nat?
01-05-2008 04:44 PM
Hi, by the example posted seems like it should be bridged, however you have many errors also:
1607 packets input, 188486 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 994 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
would try another router to verify that the circuit is working first.
01-05-2008 05:15 PM
When you say another router, do you mean try the WIC in a different router? or try a different DSL line? or try a different WIC?
--scott
01-06-2008 04:23 AM
Would try a "consumer level" dsl router on the same line.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide