cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1132
Views
10
Helpful
8
Replies

Dynamic Route /32 Redistribution over BGP

mustafa.chapal
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

I have a Cisco ASR 1001-X with full-feed BGP from multiple upstreams and a /24 IP pool is advertised to them.

When this peer 1.2.3.61 advertises a /32 route from the same /24 IP pool example 1.2.3.15/32 with community tagged as 65001:666, the annoucement does not propagate to upstreams through redistribution and is visible when I run the command

show ip bgp 1.2.3.15.

The route is only pushed to upstreams when I create a static route ip route 1.2.3.15 255.255.255.255 null0. I do want to add a static route manually as it does not serve the purpose in cases like blackholing for DDoS mitigation.

Please let me know a way in which the /32 route received from peer gets dynamically added to RIB and redistributed to upstreams through

route-map

without having to add a static route pointing towards null.

Also as you can view the BGP config below, auto-summary and synchronization are disabled.

 

 

 

router bgp 12345
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax
 neighbor 1.2.3.61 remote-as 12345
 neighbor 1.2.3.61 transport connection-mode active
 neighbor 1.2.3.61 update-source Port-channel1.100
 neighbor 1.2.3.61 version 4
 neighbor 5.6.8.1 remote-as 7890
 neighbor 5.6.8.1 transport connection-mode active
 neighbor 5.6.8.1 update-source GigabitEthernet0/0/1
 neighbor 5.6.8.1 version 4
 neighbor 5.6.7.1 remote-as 7890
 neighbor 5.6.7.1 transport connection-mode active
 neighbor 5.6.7.1 update-source GigabitEthernet0/0/0
 neighbor 5.6.7.1 version 4
 !
 address-family ipv4
  network 1.2.3.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  redistribute static route-map RTBH
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 activate
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 send-community
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 route-reflector-client
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 soft-reconfiguration inbound
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 prefix-list reserved in
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 prefix-list none out
  neighbor 1.2.3.61 maximum-prefix 1500000
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 activate
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 send-community
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 prefix-list reserved in
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 prefix-list SECONDARY out
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 route-map SECONDARY-IN in
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 route-map SECONDARY-OUT out
  neighbor 5.6.8.1 maximum-prefix 1500000
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 activate
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 send-community
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 prefix-list reserved in
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 prefix-list PRIMARY out
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 route-map PRIMARY-IN in
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 route-map PRIMARY-OUT out
  neighbor 5.6.7.1 maximum-prefix 1500000
  maximum-paths 3
 exit-address-family

ip route 1.2.3.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

route-map RTBH permit 1 
 match tag 666
 set local-preference 250
 set origin igp
 set community 7890:0
!
route-map RTBH permit 2 
 match community 65001:666
 set local-preference 250
 set origin igp
 set community 7890:0

 

 

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi @mustafa.chapal ,

This prefix is in "received-only" state, meaning it has been filtered by the inbound prefix-list named "reserved". Can you verify that the prefix-list permits 1.2.3.15/32?

Regards,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8

Harold Ritter
Level 12
Level 12

Hi @mustafa.chapal ,

You need to check why this prefix is not propagated to the upstream peer. The

show bgp ipv4 uni 1.2.3.15/32

will give you more information on why it is not propagated. You can post the output from that command if you want us to look at it in more details.

Regards,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

I think @Harold Ritter that this is default behaviour of BGP, 
the router will advertise the Connect prefix (/24) not Local prefix (/32).
and config static route toward null0 can work and can not, where it can lead to blackhole where all traffic to prefix is toward null and drop.

Hi @MHM Cisco World ,

I am not sure what default behaviour you are referring to. If you receive a /32 from a neighbor, it should be taken in consideration, even though the /24 exist locally for the same prefix. The output provided by the original poster shows that the reason for the prefix not being propagated is something else.

Regards,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

show bgp ipv4 uni 1.2.3.15/32
BGP routing table entry for 1.2.3.15/32, version 0
Paths: (1 available, no best path)
Multipath: eBGP
  Not advertised to any peer
  Refresh Epoch 1
  Local, (Received from a RR-client), (received-only)
    1.2.3.61 from 1.2.3.61 (1.2.3.61)
      Origin incomplete, localpref 100, valid, internal
      Community: 65001:666
      rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0

Hi @mustafa.chapal ,

This prefix is in "received-only" state, meaning it has been filtered by the inbound prefix-list named "reserved". Can you verify that the prefix-list permits 1.2.3.15/32?

Regards,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Hi @Harold Ritter ,

It was not being filtered in the prefix-list reserved but your message helped me figure out the issue.

I changed the local-preference to a higher number 250 and the route changed to received & used therefore getting prioritized and advertised to upstreams.

Thank you for your help

Shambhu-Kumar
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

If you want to advertise 1.2.3.15/32.  create loopback with 1.2.3.15/32 and advertise it /24 with network command. remove null 0 route.

mustafa.chapal
Level 1
Level 1

@MHM Cisco World @Shambhu-Kumar I am aware that this is the default BGP behaviour which is why I am requesting a work around so /32 route can be advertised automatically without needing to create a static route, add network command or assign IP to interface.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card