10-29-2009 11:52 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:33 AM
I have not done much config with Clocking so I am looking for some guidence. The reason for this is I am seeing a lot of slips....see below.
2821#show invcontrollers e1
E1 0/2/0 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
Cablelength is Unknown
Description:
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Version info Firmware: 20080918, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line.
Data in current interval (25 seconds elapsed):
0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Total Data (last 24 hours)
1797 Line Code Violations, 255 Path Code Violations,
4457 Slip Secs, 1 Fr Loss Secs, 4 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,
4460 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 1 Severely Err Secs, 29 Unavail Secs
E1 0/2/1 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
Cablelength is Unknown
Description:
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Version info Firmware: 20080918, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line.
Data in current interval (26 seconds elapsed):
0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
1 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
1 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Total Data (last 24 hours)
148 Line Code Violations, 3436 Path Code Violations,
1747 Slip Secs, 12 Fr Loss Secs, 11 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,
1747 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 12 Severely Err Secs, 140 Unavail Secs
Here is the show inv output and what the config is now and what I think I should change.
2821#show inv
NAME: "2821 chassis", DESCR: "2821 chassis"
PID: CISCO2821 , VID: V04 , SN:
NAME: "VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1 on Slot 0 SubSlot 2", DESCR: "VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1"
PID: VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "2nd generation four port FXO voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 SubSlot 3", DESCR: "2nd generation four port FXO voice interface daughtercard"
PID: VIC2-4FXO , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with four DSPs on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with four DSPs"
PID: PVDM2-64 , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP on Slot 0 SubSlot 5", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP"
PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: V01 , SN:
Here is the current config......
card type e1 0 2
network-clock-participate wic 2
controller E1 0/2/0
framing NO-CRC4
channel-group 0 timeslots 1-16
controller E1 0/2/1
pri-group timeslots 1-31 service mgcp
interface Serial0/2/0:0
description WAN
ip address 200.67.9.10 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
service-policy output LLQ-POLICY
interface Serial0/2/1:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-net5
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I want to make these changes
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
and leave the rest as is.
How far off am I or should I do something else?
Thanks,
Mike
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-02-2009 06:38 PM
No problems.
You can rate any post at any time.
You can mark any post in reply to your threads, at any time.
10-29-2009 12:01 PM
These are the commands you need, but taking clock form the voice circuit should be better, as data doesn-t suffer much from slips.
10-29-2009 12:13 PM
Should I do it for both circuits?
Mike
10-29-2009 12:21 PM
Are these circuits from different carriers? If so, I'd just set independent clocking on the controllers.
10-29-2009 12:38 PM
Yes, Different carriers. So I should do this?
Remove this....
network-clock-participate wic 2
add this
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/1
Thanks,
Mike
10-29-2009 01:25 PM
You cannot have multiple sources to same priority. Leave participate for wic and select priority for voice T1.
10-29-2009 02:00 PM
The int 0/2/1 is just PRI backup the 0/2/0 is Voip and Data. I would leave the network-clock-participate wic 2 ?
and just add...
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
Thanks
Mike
10-29-2009 03:40 PM
One or the other as priority 1, and check the results.
Please remember to rate useful posts with the scrollbox below.
10-30-2009 05:28 AM
Let me re-word this as I am still a little confused. Based on all the information above and where my WIC cards are installed should this be how I configure this...if not please post what I should be doing. Interface 0/2/0 is VoIP and data and the most important circuit, Interface 0/2/1 is backup PRI's provided by a different vendor. With that said here is what I think I should do but please let me know if that is incorrect or what my config should be...
I think I should remove
network-clock-participate wic 2
And then I should add
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 2 E1 0/2/1
Or should I do something else?
Thanks,
Mike
10-30-2009 06:00 AM
I have indicated already and repeatedly the appropriate configuration. That is, 100% correct and verifiable information.
Then, I'm not sure from who and why I got low ratings in this thread. If it is from you Mike, I can only say that is wrong attitude toward me, good luck.
10-30-2009 06:10 AM
The information you provided has been good. Like I said in the begining I have not done very much configuring with Clocking and I am just trying to confirm what I have learned from you post which have helped me get to where I am. What I am trying to get answered is what you have given me so far which has helped and based on that am I correct in doint this config?
I think I should remove
network-clock-participate wic 2
And then I should add
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 2 E1 0/2/1
Or should I do something else?
I was hoping for a yes that looks correct or no you should do this instead. Your posts so far have been helpful and I truly appreceate you help.
Thanks,
Mike
10-30-2009 06:26 AM
I just checked how the ratings worked because I was in no way deminishing your help. I see with my ratings it will impact your over all rating. I was being too literal in my ratings and should have rated as an overall. I do appolgize for my misundersatnding and your post have helped me alot.
Thanks,
Mike
11-02-2009 12:58 PM
p.bevilacqua,
I was wondering if you could reply to this so I could mark this as solution recieved. I put the config you listed and all worked great. Thanks for your help and I am sorry for any misunderstandings, you of great help.
Thanks,
Mike
11-02-2009 06:38 PM
No problems.
You can rate any post at any time.
You can mark any post in reply to your threads, at any time.
11-03-2009 08:09 AM
Thanks for your help on this. After I finally got it through my thick skull what you were saying I got it. It has been a very busy couple months so I was a little off. Again thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Mike
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide