Ok, hoping someone out there is creative and hoping I don't have to add more equipment.
Here's the situation:
ME3400E <-- Carrier w/ Tag 590 --> ME3400E
The question is... is there *any* way to run QinQ over tag 590 where the ME3400s are able to utilize inside tags? I don't think so... or at least not without doing some ghetto physical loop between two ports.
It's been a while since you posted this.. We have exactly the same scenario.. Did you ever get an answer?
We reckon that the "ghetto looping" idea will work, and although it feels wrong in every way, there's no technical reason why it won't work. And we can't think of any other way around it without adding another piece of kit behind each of the ME's.
We are having issues with a WS-C2960X-48FPD-L running IOS 15.2(2)E7. Some ports are simply not working. We had POE issues on some of the ports and decided to upgrade to hopefully resolve those issues but this has now become an even bigger issu...
the scenario is :I'm replacing core Cisco switch 4506-E with switch 4507R-E. As I have one supervisor card on 4506-E and I'm going to take out all the card that I have in 4506-E and install it in the new 4507R-E. On the 4507R-E I have 2 slots for the supe...
Since its release in August of 2019, the SASE report released by Gartner has generated a lot of chatter regarding what SASE is all about. People are wondering whether it will be disruptive to the current network and network security designs and are curiou...
I tried to setup a virtual environment with 2960 switches and 2911 Router. In one part of the network where I connected PCs directly to the 2911 Router, I was able to communicate to the attached devices, having configured static route. In the th...
Network Insider Live Webinar
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:00 am Pacific Time (San Francisco, GMT-08:00)
Learn how Software-Defined Access and new innovations in Cisco DNA Center provide a better way to control your network. We will explore new enhancements, ...