02-11-2014 03:49 AM - edited 03-04-2019 10:18 PM
Hello, i have a problem with my cisco ASR9K
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-XX#sh run int GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
Tue Feb 11 18:43:01.345 GMT
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
description XX
bandwidth 128
service-policy input rate_limit_128k
service-policy output Package2-128k-parent
vrf cc
ipv4 address 10.111.21.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation dot1q 3838
!
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-XX#show arp vrf cc GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
Tue Feb 11 18:43:06.763 GMT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/0/CPU0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address Age Hardware Addr State Type Interface
10.111.21.1 - 4055.391f.6134 Interface ARPA GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
10.111.21.2 00:00:17 0025.64a6.a08e Dynamic ARPA GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
10.111.21.10 00:13:49 0025.64a6.a08e Dynamic ARPA GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-XX#show route vrf cc | i 3838
Tue Feb 11 18:43:14.780 GMT
i have configured properly this sub interface of my router, if i show the arp it detected, but why if i show route, there is no connected local route detected from my sub interface
i'm sorry if my english bad
thx a lot.
02-11-2014 10:52 AM
Hi,
Maybe a stupid question but did you do sh ip route vrf cc ?
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
02-11-2014 02:16 PM
There is so many local, static, and connected route
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-D4-GBL-VPN#show route vrf cc | i Gig
Wed Feb 12 04:58:50.944 GMT
S 10.111.11.0/24 [1/0] via 172.31.100.222, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/11.3821
S 10.111.141.0/24 [1/0] via 172.16.0.42, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2785
C 172.16.0.0/30 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2837
L 172.16.0.1/32 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2837
C 172.16.0.4/30 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2805
L 172.16.0.5/32 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2805
C 172.16.0.8/30 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2802
L 172.16.0.9/32 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2802
C 172.16.0.12/30 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/11.2126
L 172.16.0.13/32 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/11.2126
C 172.16.0.32/30 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2849
L 172.16.0.33/32 is directly connected, 02:50:55, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.2849
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-D4-GBL-VPN#show ipv4 vrf cc interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838 brief
Wed Feb 12 05:04:17.971 GMT
Interface IP-Address Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.3838 10.111.21.1 Up Up
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-D4-GBL-VPN#show ip route vrf cc | i 3838
Wed Feb 12 05:00:10.415 GMT
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-D4-GBL-VPN#
but none of vlan 3838 is detected as local and connected in this PE
is that a bug ? or maybe the subinterface in my asr is full
this is the capture of total circuit in my PE
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:PE-XX#show interfaces summary
Wed Feb 12 05:14:21.244 GMT
Interface Type Total UP Down Admin Down
-------------- ----- -- ---- ----------
ALL TYPES 2240 1872 2 366
--------------
IFT_GETHERNET 40 11 0 29
IFT_VLAN_SUBIF 2182 1856 0 326
IFT_LOOPBACK 1 1 0 0
IFT_ETHERNET 4 0 1 3
IFT_NULL 1 1 0 0
IFT_TENGETHERNET 12 3 1 8
sry if my question is stupid, i desperately want to troubleshoot this problem in my workplace
thx for the help
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide