11-05-2007 08:22 AM - edited 03-03-2019 07:25 PM
I am implementing a new network and ip subnet where I work. The problem is that one User needs to have a static IP to our mother corporation but I cannot get the static NAT to work. My question is, will having this;
nat (inside) 1 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
With multiple addresses for PAT conflict with this static NAT;
static (outside,inside) 198.182.113.70 10.1.90.50 netmask 255.255.255.255
and if so does anyone have any suggestions on how I can work around this?
11-06-2007 11:46 AM
My recollection is - it's been a while - that the PAT rule takes precedence, so you will need to use an ACL to deny the 10.1.90.50/32 host then permit the 10.1.0.0/16 net.
Such as:
Overload rule:
access-list overload deny 10.1.90.50
access-list overload permit 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
Then build your nat rules
nat (inside) 1 access-list overload
Lastly build your static rule.
Think that should do it; I don't have a Pix in front of me right now to try it on.
11-06-2007 12:02 PM
The static (outside,inside) 198.182.113.70 10.1.90.50 netmask 255.255.255.255 should be
static (inside, outside) 198.182.113.70 10.1.90.50 netmask 255.255.255.255.
Do a clear xlate after you configure the static NAT and test it.
Regards,
Arul
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide