Hi,
Scenario has changed since the last post, so can someone advice if solution still Ok with additional requirement
In Our Scenario Site_A is connected to Site_B via IPSEC GRE Tunnel running OSPF as routing protocol.
Site_A host all applications for Site_B.
We already have inplace another point-2-point link between Site_A to Site_B and
have specific requirement.
POS_Server only from Site_A should send traffic on this P-2-P link to Site_B.
Any traffic initiated from Site_B to POS_Server on Site_A should be via P-2-P link.
All other traffic should pass IPSEC-Gre_Tunnel
/// Solution proposed by ediortiz :-\\\\
On the router at Site_A
access-list 101 permit ip [server_ip] [site_b subnet]
route-map server_pbr
match address 101
set ip next-hop [p-2-p link]
interface fx/x
description LAN facing interface
ip policy route-map server_pbr
On the router at Site_B
access-list 101 permit ip [site_b subnet] [server_ip]
route-map server_pbr
match address 101
set ip next-hop [p-2-p link]
interface fx/x
description LAN facing interface
ip policy route-map server_pbr
(((Additional Scenario)))
If there is another Site IPSEC GRE Tunnel running OSPF added on _A connected to Site_C via
All traffic from Site_A to Site_C will pass using the Tunnel.
Site_A------IPSEC_GRE_Tunnel------Site_B
Site_A---------P_2_P--------------Site_B
Site_A------IPSEC_GRE_Tunnel------Site_C
Will the above configuration impact the traffic from POS_Server located on Site_A to Site_C
