02-17-2012 02:22 PM - edited 03-04-2019 03:19 PM
mls qos map policed-dscp 22 30 to 14
mls qos map policed-dscp 26 to 30
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 22 30 34 46 48 56
mls qos map ip-prec-dscp 0 8 22 30 34 46 48 56
mls qos
class-map match-all ControlTraffic
match access-group 102
match ip dscp af31
match ip precedence 3
class-map match-all VoiceTraffic
match access-group 100
match ip dscp ef
match ip precedence 5
class-map match-all VideoTraffic
match access-group 101
match ip dscp af33
match ip precedence 3
class-map match-all CriticalTraffic
match access-group 103
match ip dscp af23
match ip precedence 2
policy-map Enterprise_QoS
description Enterprise Traffic Policy
class VoiceTraffic
set ip dscp ef
police 5000000 65536 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
class VideoTraffic
set ip dscp af33
police 2000000 65536 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
class ControlTraffic
set ip dscp af31
police 1000000 65536 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
class CriticalTraffic
set ip dscp af23
police 1000000 65536 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-110,150
switchport mode trunk
__________________________________________________
When I run:
1. Conf t
2. Int GI1/0/24
3. Service-Policy Input Enterprise_QoS
The interface configuration does not change. I cannot apply the service-policy to any interface. This is a 3750 running 15.0(1)SE.
What is blocking the service policy from applying to the interface?
02-17-2012 02:40 PM
Hi,
Is there anything logged to say the command was rejected? I had a similar issue and I could see a rejection notice when I checked the logs (show logging).
What iOS feature set do you have installed? It may not support your exceed-action statement inbound on an interface.
Thanks
Chris
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
02-17-2012 02:50 PM
There are no rejection notices in the logs.
I'm running the IPBase feature set.
I configured another Policy map without the policing statements
policy-map Enterprise-QoS
description Enterprise Traffic Policy
class VoiceTraffic
set ip dscp ef
class VideoTraffic
set ip dscp af33
class ControlTraffic
set ip dscp af31
class CriticalTraffic
set ip dscp af23
and I still can't apply the service-policy to any interface
12-08-2016 04:46 AM
I just ran into the same issue, after configuring the service-policy on an interface, there is no error, but the command isn't applied to the interface.
The cause of this is the match-all or match-any statement in the class-map. if you configure the class-map like "class-map VoiceTraffic" it works fine.
This means that you're unable to allocate multiple access-list to the class-map, and thus need to reorganize your access-lists
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide