Site-to-Site VPN with Unequal load-sharing with static routes
We are planning to deploy ASA 5525 and enable unequal load-sharing with static routes(1:1). We have two different ISP Provider (30Mbps and 45Mbps lease line). Also, we want to enable Site-to-Site VPN with our other branch. So will this unequal load-sharing with static routes creates any issue configuring site-to-site VPN. My main concern is that for both the two ISP line the local ip are in the same range. So will it create any problem?
Scenario: 1 ISP: 10.4.1.1
2 ISP: 18.104.22.168
Local ip 192.168.1.1 (DHCP enable 22.214.171.124 - 192.168.5.250)
unequal load sharing with static routes.... I think it's not possible or maybe you want unequal cost load sharing, that is possible with eigrp but at the end CEF table will decide when to use one route over the other.
Show CommandPurposeCiscoICX-RuckusShow Spanning tree infoShow spanning-treeshow 802-1wVerify Port-Channel / Link aggregation infosh lag briefsh etherchannel summaryShow CDC/LDP neighbor infoshow cdp neighbors detailsh lldp neighbors de sh mac a...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.
Introduction to SD-Access Multicast
The document describes the Cisco DNAC UI workflow introduced as part of the Cisco DNA Center1.3.3 release. The document covers the components of Multicast forwarding on SD-Access fabric and the configuration pushed to...