I input the following configuration on a CPE router:
dlsw local-peer peer-id <address>
dlsw timer explorer-wait-time 100
dlsw load-balance circuit-count
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10
dlsw bridge-group 9
In a normal operation all circuits are stablished over remote dlsw routers <address1> and <address2> in a load balance way.
But I note the following behavior if the <address1> router fail, when I list the configuration, I see:
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10
The router send the failed peer to the last position on configuration list.
This is correct or is a bug ?
Thank's in advance.
