3560's not routing...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 09:00 AM - edited 03-05-2019 03:50 PM
Can anyone please tell me why these two 3560's are not routing?
Test#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2605 bytes
!
version 12.2
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.90.153.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 1
network 10.90.153.0 0.0.0.255
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
auto-summary
!
ip default-gateway 10.90.153.200
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/17
!
-----------------------------------------------
E3#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2816 bytes
!
version 12.2
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/48
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
macro description cisco-switch
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
!
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.23.31.34 255.255.255.224
!
router eigrp 1
network 172.23.31.32 0.0.0.31
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
auto-summary
!
ip default-gateway 172.23.31.33
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33
!
- Labels:
-
Other Switching
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 11:57 AM
Hi,
I'm not too sure what you're issue is, "not routing" is a pretty vague statement. Are your devices forming eigrp neighbor relationships? If so, it may be an issue with "auto-summary". In eigrp configuration, type "no auto-summary" so you're networks aren't summarized at the classful boundary.
-Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 12:07 PM
Thanks for responding.
I can't ping from the 172.23.31.32/27 net
to the 10.90.153.0/24 net
Attached is a screen shot of the routing tables of one of the switches
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 12:26 PM
Well, it seems that the 10.90.153.0 network is not in your eigrp routing table at all, meaning that anything destined for that network will use the static route you have applied (ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33). I'm not exactly sure what this route is doing... Is there more than the 2 devices stated in this network?
-Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 01:04 PM
There is a router attached to port 48 that
is the default gateway for the whole network.
I turned off auto-summarization on the switch named Test and it now shows the 172.23.31.32/27 net in it's routing table,
but when I did it on the switch E3, it did not pick up the 10.90.153.0/24 net.
?
Current configs and tables attached.
Thanks for your help,
Ric
----------------------------------------
E3#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2819 bytes
!
version 12.2
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/48
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
macro description cisco-switch
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.23.31.34 255.255.255.224
!
router eigrp 1
network 172.23.31.32 0.0.0.31
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
!
ip default-gateway 172.23.31.33
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33
----------------------------------------
Test#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2600 bytes
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.90.153.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 1
network 10.90.153.0 0.0.0.255
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
!
ip default-gateway 172.23.31.33
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 01:21 PM
Based on your EIGRP configuration, I can't see anything wrong. I DO see a problem with your static default route on Test though.
Neither "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33" or "ip default-gateway 172.23.31.33" should be configured on Test because that is not a next hop address this router is familiar with.
Instead, I suggest that you enter the "default-information originate" or "redistribute static" command in EIGRP on your E3 router. This maaaay fix your issues.
-Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2007 01:31 PM
Oh, you should also check to see if Vlan 1 is even UP on Test. This route wont get advertised by EIGRP if the SVI is down, might want to check that out too if the previous solution doesn't do anything.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 05:59 AM
VLAN 1 is up on Test. I can connect a client as 10.90.153.x
and ping the E3 switch at 172.23.31.34, but no other IP's
on that 172.23.31.32/27 net.
I changed the default on Test as shown below and no luck.
There's something on the E3 switch that is not right.
I even tried making VLAN 1 passive on E3 and no luck.
Thanks, Ric
---------------------------------------------------------
Test#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2575 bytes
!
version 12.2
!
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.90.153.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 1
network 10.90.153.0 0.0.0.255
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/17
Test#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0
172.23.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 172.23.31.32 [90/3072] via 192.168.1.2, 16:54:44, GigabitEthernet0/17
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.90.153.0 is directly connected, Vlan1
192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 192.168.1.0 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/17
S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/17
-------------------------------------------------------------
E3#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2819 bytes
!
version 12.2
!
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
no switchport
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/48
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
macro description cisco-switch
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.23.31.34 255.255.255.224
!
router eigrp 1
network 172.23.31.32 0.0.0.31
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
!
ip default-gateway 172.23.31.33
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.23.31.33
E3#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 172.23.31.33 to network 0.0.0.0
172.23.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 172.23.31.32 is directly connected, Vlan1
192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 192.168.1.0 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/17
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.23.31.33
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 06:42 AM
Its a strange situation which is happening. EIGRP is making a neighbor relationship as far as " Test " switch is concerned. What happens when you issue " show ip eigrp neighbor " on E3 switch. Do you see the test listed a neighbor.
Here are the two things that we can try:
1.Try changing the connection between the 2 switches to a vlan SVI instead of using the routed port.Let us check if the eigrp neighbor relationship comes up.
2.Try debugging thye rigrp relationship and attach the debugs.
-amit singh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 10:16 AM
E3>show ip eigrp neighbor
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq Type
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 192.168.1.1 Gi0/17 12 21:41:42 5 200 0 12
On suggestion #1, do you mean connect them together without using the 192.168.1.0/30 net?
Thanks, Ric
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 10:25 AM
He means:
Test#
int vlan 192
ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
no shut
int gi0/17
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 192
E3#
int vlan 192
ip add 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
no shut
int gi0/17
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 192
At least I think he means that... Give it a shot and get back to us.
-Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 10:45 AM
Yeah. I meant the same as posted by Chris. The output in your earlier post shows that E has a succesful naighbor relationship with test.Please paste the output of " show EIGRP topo " from the E3.
Also let me know the IOS version that your are running on 3560's.
-amit singh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 12:20 PM
E3>show ip eigrp topo
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(192.168.1.2)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 192.168.1.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 2816
via Connected, GigabitEthernet0/17
P 172.23.31.32/27, 1 successors, FD is 2816
via Connected, Vlan1
version 12.2
E3 is not picking up the 10.90.153.0/24 net in it's routing table. Diagram is attached.
?
Thanks, Ric
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 12:39 PM
I really wnat to fihure this out....
Here's what Test looks like:
Test>show ip eigrp topo
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(192.168.1.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 192.168.1.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 2816
via Connected, GigabitEthernet0/17
P 172.23.31.32/27, 1 successors, FD is 3072
via 192.168.1.2 (3072/2816), GigabitEthernet0/17
P 10.90.153.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2816
via Connected, Vlan1
Thanks very much, Ric
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2007 12:57 PM
Did you at any point had an interface on router E3 configured with an IP from 10.90.153.0/24 subnet?
