10-18-2012 05:28 AM - edited 03-07-2019 09:32 AM
Hi,
I have been looking at deploying a small core switch design for an important branch office that would consist of 2 cores with an etherchannel link and then 4 POE access switches linked to both cores utilising STP. I will also want static IP routing on the cores and will set up HSRP for gateway failover.
The initial switch I looked at for the core was WS-C3560E-24TD-S however after finding that there is no stock around of this at the moment I have seen the WS-C3560X-24T-S which looks like it will do everything I need including IP routing, HSRP and QoS for VOIP. The thing that concerns me is this is about £1000 cheaper so i'm slightly worried im missing someting. Any help in identifying this would be much apprciated?
Many thanks,
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-20-2012 01:31 PM
Hi RHorsnell,
First of all 3560E are end of life and the 3560X is the replacement for it so you should go for it. Don't believe you will have any feature shortcomings.
Basically I understand 3560X are an evolution of 3560E switches. But they have some modularity. 3560X you won't have gigabit or 10gigabit uplinks unless you order them if you need to. 3560E came with fixed 10gigabit uplinks.
I also read somewhere that 3560X are more energy efficient.
From 3560X Q&A 2nd question:
Q. What is new in the Cisco Catalyst 3750-X and 3560-X Series Switches?
A. The Cisco Catalyst X-Series switches build on the E-Series switches and add the following features:
• Cisco StackPower™ technology, available only on the Cisco Catalyst 3750-X (requires IP Base), manages power very efficiently by aggregating and sharing power supplies across a stack of switches. It also supports a feature known as Zero-Footprint RPS.
• Field-replaceable network module provides 4 x 1 Gigabit and 2 x 10 Gigabit uplink interfaces for the switch.
• Full 802.3at PoE+ support provides 30W per port on all 48 ports in a single rack unit (RU) switch.
• New LAN Base feature set offers comprehensive Layer 2 functionality.
• Dual redundant power supplies and fans: Four high-efficiency power supply options are available, including a DC power supply for PoE applications. Two redundant, field-replaceable fan modules are also included.
• MACsec provides hardware-based encryption (802.1ae) at line rate on all 48 ports (requires IP Base). Includes MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) (included in Dot1X-rev).
Hope I could help
Regards
Mario
10-20-2012 01:31 PM
Hi RHorsnell,
First of all 3560E are end of life and the 3560X is the replacement for it so you should go for it. Don't believe you will have any feature shortcomings.
Basically I understand 3560X are an evolution of 3560E switches. But they have some modularity. 3560X you won't have gigabit or 10gigabit uplinks unless you order them if you need to. 3560E came with fixed 10gigabit uplinks.
I also read somewhere that 3560X are more energy efficient.
From 3560X Q&A 2nd question:
Q. What is new in the Cisco Catalyst 3750-X and 3560-X Series Switches?
A. The Cisco Catalyst X-Series switches build on the E-Series switches and add the following features:
• Cisco StackPower™ technology, available only on the Cisco Catalyst 3750-X (requires IP Base), manages power very efficiently by aggregating and sharing power supplies across a stack of switches. It also supports a feature known as Zero-Footprint RPS.
• Field-replaceable network module provides 4 x 1 Gigabit and 2 x 10 Gigabit uplink interfaces for the switch.
• Full 802.3at PoE+ support provides 30W per port on all 48 ports in a single rack unit (RU) switch.
• New LAN Base feature set offers comprehensive Layer 2 functionality.
• Dual redundant power supplies and fans: Four high-efficiency power supply options are available, including a DC power supply for PoE applications. Two redundant, field-replaceable fan modules are also included.
• MACsec provides hardware-based encryption (802.1ae) at line rate on all 48 ports (requires IP Base). Includes MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) (included in Dot1X-rev).
Hope I could help
Regards
Mario
10-22-2012 02:51 AM
Thanks for the reply, looks like they'll do the job.
Cheers
10-22-2012 06:26 AM
Glad to help RHorsnell.
Don't forget to rate useful posts
MP
10-22-2012 02:21 AM
Just want to make it clear that you are NOT going to implementing MPLS/Full VRF now or in the future, right?
10-22-2012 02:52 AM
No intentions for that but thanks for the heads up.
09-15-2023 05:01 PM
hi - what will happen if we do the MPLS/FULL VRF is that not supporting?
09-16-2023 03:38 AM
I recall (?) none of 3560/3750 series support MPLS, but do support VRF-Lite.
10-25-2012 12:28 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
You might want to consider stacking a pair of 3750-Xs in lieu of a pair of 3560-Xs.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide