07-09-2011 07:51 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:09 AM
I work for a school district and a ticket came in late last night that perplexes me
A few gi ints and a few fa ints went into the up/down state (both on diff modules). Total number of ints in this state are 10, they were up/up Thursday. Sometime on Friday they went into up/down.
I shut/no shut an int, didnt help.
I have restarted one module, didnt help.
The log doesnt show any issues.
All the downstream switches are either 3548 XL or 2950s.
GigabitEthernet2/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet2/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet2/3 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet2/4 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet2/5 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet4/9 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet4/10 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet4/11 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet4/12 unassigned YES unset up down
FastEthernet4/13 unassigned YES unset up down
FastEthernet4/14 unassigned YES unset up down
Here is a gi config:
0532-RTR-01#sh run int gi2/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 155 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/2
description SW-IDF701-01
mls qos trust dscp
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
end
I will visit the site Monday to see whats going on, but any ideas?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-09-2011 09:08 AM
Hi Jimmy,
Up/Down indicates that while the phsyical line is good - meaning you're seeing that there is a device connected at the other side - but it is not negotiating the link successfully.
This could be caused by a unidirectional link of some type, a hardware/software failure on the switch, or the other side could be err-disabled or shutdown on the other side. This could also be a problem if different protocols are used for trunking(ISL vs dot1q).
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Sweta
P.S. Please rate the answer if it was helpful.
07-09-2011 09:08 AM
Hi Jimmy,
Up/Down indicates that while the phsyical line is good - meaning you're seeing that there is a device connected at the other side - but it is not negotiating the link successfully.
This could be caused by a unidirectional link of some type, a hardware/software failure on the switch, or the other side could be err-disabled or shutdown on the other side. This could also be a problem if different protocols are used for trunking(ISL vs dot1q).
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Sweta
P.S. Please rate the answer if it was helpful.
07-09-2011 09:20 AM
The odd part is that it happened to about 10 access layer switches (all of course now are now not reachable). Its not blade specifc. I have been trying to fix this remotely, but after shutting/no shutting the port, and also reset the module, think I will have to arrive onsite Monday to see what the heck is going on.
Jul 8 16:43:29.191: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 4 set off (Reset)
Jul 8 16:44:10.043: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 4: Running Minimum Online Diagnostics...
Jul 8 16:44:18.703: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 4: Passed Online Diagnostics
Jul 8 16:44:19.043: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 4, interfaces are now online
After the above, the ports in question are still up/down. Some are fiber links, rest are ethernet. The module above was the fa module.
I didnt reboot the whole sw, as I dont see how that would fix anything. Though best to reboot it now or Sun vs. Monday morning I guess. I am going to wait, I want to console into the access layer sw and see what it has to say. I am not seeing any issues on the 6506. Thanks for your input!
07-09-2011 10:31 PM
Can't be UDLD because the ports would've gone into err-disable plus the 3500XL doesn't support UDLD.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide