Apparently, on the N5K, the SPAN function can induce back-pressure on the ingress interface.
Does this happen with any other platform? Searching www.cisco.com, seems to me that this only applies to the N5K ... but perhaps this effect has only been /documented/ for the N5K ... perhaps it happens on other platforms. Does anyone know?
"If the SPAN source interface sends more than 6-Gbps traffic or if traffic bursts too much, the device drops traffic on the source interface. You can use the switchport monitor rate-limit 1G command on the SPAN destination to reduce the dropping of actual traffic on the source interface; however, SPAN traffic is restricted to 1 Gbps."
"SPAN traffic is rate-limited as follows on Nexus 5500 series switches to prevent a negative impact to production traffic:
SPAN is rate-limited to 5 Gbps for every 8 ports (one ASIC).
RX-SPAN is rate-limited to 0.71 Gbps per port when the RX-traffic on the port exceeds 5 Gbps."
I've been poking at this question intermittently ... and I'm stumbling in finding a definitive source 'knowledge base' article.
Still, at the moment, it seems to me that the N5K has a unique feature here, the ability to shield ingress (source) traffic from the contention induced by a SPAN port.
I don't see a similar feature on the C4K or C6K, for example (i.e. rate-limiting SPAN ports).
In thinking about this, it seems to me that one needs to understand the architecture of the switch in order to assess the potential for impacting source traffic. So, for example, if one is SPANning a port on a typical C4K line card (8 10/100/1000 ports sharing a single 1Gps uplink to the Sup card) *and* one is mirroring to another member of the same 8 port group, then it seems like to me that the source port would discard frames, assuming that the source port is pushing past 50% of that 1 Gps uplink.
That being said, I have a buddy who believes the C6K is fairly immune to this effect, on account of some aspect of its switching design.
Am I on the right track here, in terms of figuring out (a) how to assess potential impact to source traffic, and (b) in claiming that only the N5K has this SPAN rate-limiting command?
Before I go leaving sniffers SPANning 10Gb/s ports for long periods of time, I want to understand the risk of impacting production traffic.
Hi everyone.I have a problem in my Network.So i have 3 routers and a firewall in my topology. I have configured OSPF and all routers works expect R3 (see in the image below)When I watch my neignbor in R3 it says :192.168.7.7 1 INIT/DROTHER 00:00:37 10.0.2...
Host Onboarding is the term used when connecting an endpoint (hosts , IOT , Other devices) to the fabric , and can be accomplished in a couple of ways.One option is the "static" approach as oppose to the dynamic and secure approach using&nbs...
good morning I have this report from users, saying that they encounter connection issue only when they are wired , but the wireless I fine. both connection are using the same path to the internet ...please advised a troubleshooting plan.
Enterprise Switching Business Unit is glad to announce Beta release 16.12.3 for all Catalyst 9200/9300/9400/9500/9600. This release is made available to allow users to test, evaluate and share feedback before General Avail...