08-29-2011 03:06 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:56 AM
Hey Guys,
I am doing up a etherchannel of 4 x physical 100Mb port and I am seeing a 100Mb bandwidth on the port channel?
Is that an issue?
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-29-2011 03:17 AM
Lawrence
So do you mean the actual bandwidth figure under the port-channel ?
Apologies but i meant to ask for "sh etherchannel summary". Can you post that.
Jon
08-29-2011 03:30 AM
Make sure you are looking for this BW only--
4-mem-stack#sh int po1
Port-channel1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 04c5.a473.8c01 (bia 04c5.a473.8c01)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
Also let us know which two switches are connected in addition to info asked by Jon.
08-29-2011 03:11 AM
Do you mean when you do a "sh interface po
If so is your etherchannel working ie. "sh etherchannel"
What is the switch and IOS version.
Jon
08-29-2011 03:15 AM
Hey Jon,
It is working
show etherchannel
Channel-group listing:
----------------------
Group: 1
----------
Group state = L2
Ports: 3 Maxports = 8
Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 1
Protocol: PAgP
IOS:c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5
08-29-2011 03:17 AM
Lawrence
So do you mean the actual bandwidth figure under the port-channel ?
Apologies but i meant to ask for "sh etherchannel summary". Can you post that.
Jon
08-29-2011 03:30 AM
Make sure you are looking for this BW only--
4-mem-stack#sh int po1
Port-channel1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 04c5.a473.8c01 (bia 04c5.a473.8c01)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
Also let us know which two switches are connected in addition to info asked by Jon.
08-29-2011 05:29 AM
Hey Jon and Ankur,
I had rebooted the switch and when it came up the Port-channel reflected the bandwidth correctly. I will monitor and see.
Many thanks for your assistance!
08-29-2011 06:53 AM
Hey Guys,
I got 1 more problem.
Topology:
LAN - 3750G (A) - (4 x 100Mb links aggregated into 1 port-channel) 3750 (B) - Internet
I am doing source mac address base loadbalancing on 3750G (L2) at A and the Service Provider is running destination mac address loadbalancing on the 3750 (L2) at B.
I am not able to get an aggregated bandwidth of more than 100Mb upload on the port-channel at the 3750G at A when various places from the Internet is doing a download from my server behind LAN.
Is that the expected behavior?
08-29-2011 08:10 AM
I think this might be expected...Since your switch is L2,so all the packets passing through Switch (3750G (A)) will have same source mac address...Since load balancing is done using src mac address,so all the packets will take the same port of the etherchannel...Etherchannel load balancing is not the equal cost load balancing..It is distributed based on the criteria used for load balancing...You should try to use other load balancing criteria like Dest IP to get more bandwidth.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide