ā11-21-2017 08:49 PM - edited ā03-08-2019 12:49 PM
Hi everyone,
Does anybody know what happens to existing servers connected via vPC or to the vPC domain itself when configuring BPDU guard globally on a pair of Nexus 5548 vPC peers, assuming inter-switch links are configured as type network or default (no type edge/edge trunk)?
Is it better to configure BPDU guard at an interface level instead, and what is the impact to servers in this case?
Thanks
Fed
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā11-23-2017 03:50 AM
But you can easily check if its effecting it , if its up/up it should be fine and check the traffic counters make sure its processing through the interface, I would not think a bpduguard on one end and not the other would take a interface down as its an optional parameter for the vpc and not a requirement for it to work but I have not tested it to be sure , if your concerned about causing further issues when updating the config you could follow the below procedure to limit the impact
Virtual Port Channel Operations
One of the challenges with vPC topologies is how to make configuration changes with minimum traffic disruption. Due to the consistency check, the configuration made on one vPC switch could potentially lead to consistency check failure and traffic disruption.
Beginning with Cisco NX-OS Release 5.0(2)N2(1), you can use the following procedure to make configuration changes for Type 1 consistency check parameters on a Cisco Nexus 5000 Series switch. We recommend that you perform the following procedure during a maintenance window because it might reduce the vPC bandwidth by half for a short duration.
Note A graceful consistency-check does not apply to dual-homed FEX ports. As a result, both switches keep the port down for the duration of an inconsistency. Using the configuration synchronization feature reduces the duration of the inconsistency.
To make configuration changes for Type 1 consistency-check parameters, follow these steps:
Step 1 Enable graceful consistency-check in a vPC domain.
Step 2 Enable the configuration synchronization feature on both vPC peer switches.
For details on using the configuration synchronization feature, see the āConfiguration Synchronization Operationsā chapter.
Step 3 Perform all configuration changes in the switch profile.
When you commit switch profile configurations on the local switch, the configuration is also sent to the vPC peer switch to reduce misconfigurations when changes are made on only one vPC switch and to reduce the downtime because the configuration is applied rapidly. When there is a short mismatch duration, a graceful consistency-check keeps the primary side forwarding traffic.
Note When you are making a configuration change for a Type 2 consistency check parameter, such as Allowed VLAN for trunk ports, you do not need to follow this procedure
ā11-22-2017 01:36 AM
ā11-22-2017 08:48 PM
Thanks Mark, again this is related to my previous post, however I was more interested in knowing what happens when the server is already connected to a vPC port-channel being port type edge or edge trunk, and you enable BPDU guard on the Po interface (not globally) on one of the vPC peers.
Is the difference in configuration between the two vPC peers going to create issues? In other words, does the vPC consistency type-2 check bring the port-channel interface on the secondary vPC down (or anyway put it into an inconsistent state) because BPDU guard is configured on one vPC peer only?
What's the expected behaviour for these vPC peer switches and their ports in this case?
ā11-23-2017 03:50 AM
But you can easily check if its effecting it , if its up/up it should be fine and check the traffic counters make sure its processing through the interface, I would not think a bpduguard on one end and not the other would take a interface down as its an optional parameter for the vpc and not a requirement for it to work but I have not tested it to be sure , if your concerned about causing further issues when updating the config you could follow the below procedure to limit the impact
Virtual Port Channel Operations
One of the challenges with vPC topologies is how to make configuration changes with minimum traffic disruption. Due to the consistency check, the configuration made on one vPC switch could potentially lead to consistency check failure and traffic disruption.
Beginning with Cisco NX-OS Release 5.0(2)N2(1), you can use the following procedure to make configuration changes for Type 1 consistency check parameters on a Cisco Nexus 5000 Series switch. We recommend that you perform the following procedure during a maintenance window because it might reduce the vPC bandwidth by half for a short duration.
Note A graceful consistency-check does not apply to dual-homed FEX ports. As a result, both switches keep the port down for the duration of an inconsistency. Using the configuration synchronization feature reduces the duration of the inconsistency.
To make configuration changes for Type 1 consistency-check parameters, follow these steps:
Step 1 Enable graceful consistency-check in a vPC domain.
Step 2 Enable the configuration synchronization feature on both vPC peer switches.
For details on using the configuration synchronization feature, see the āConfiguration Synchronization Operationsā chapter.
Step 3 Perform all configuration changes in the switch profile.
When you commit switch profile configurations on the local switch, the configuration is also sent to the vPC peer switch to reduce misconfigurations when changes are made on only one vPC switch and to reduce the downtime because the configuration is applied rapidly. When there is a short mismatch duration, a graceful consistency-check keeps the primary side forwarding traffic.
Note When you are making a configuration change for a Type 2 consistency check parameter, such as Allowed VLAN for trunk ports, you do not need to follow this procedure
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide