03-18-2015 02:16 PM - edited 03-07-2019 11:09 PM
Good afternoon,
I'm having an issue that I hope the community can help me with.
We have a corporate LAN (192.168.0.0/24), and a secondary LAN (192.168.2.0/24) at a remote site. At the remote site, we also have an internal network of servo-controllers which operate on 10.10.0.0/16, where each zone has it's own group of IP addresses (i.e., 10.10.0.0/24 for Zone 0, 10.10.1.0/24 for Zone 1, etc.)
What we need is the ability to access the 10.10.0.0/16 machines from the others. Eventually, we will need to create a site-to-site VPN tunnel to allow outside users to connect to them (for monitoring purposes), but right now, we cannot even ping them, even though they are on the network and up and running. What do I need to do to be able to see the 10.10.0.0/16 on the 192.168.2.0/24 and 0.0/24?
I will post running-configs from any relevant devices shortly.
Thanks.
03-18-2015 03:06 PM
We need to know what switches etc. all the devices are connected to ?
What vlans do you have setup and how do they relate to the IP addressing you mention ?
Where do you do the routing between vlans ?
Jon
03-19-2015 08:31 AM
Current configuration : 2860 bytes!version 12.4service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryption!hostname HOSTNAME!boot-start-markerboot system flash c1841-ipbasek9-mz.124-15.T8.binboot-end-marker!logging buffered 51200 warningsenable secret 5 ***!no aaa new-modelclock timezone cst -6clock summer-time cdt recurringdot11 syslogip cef!!no ip dhcp use vrf connectedip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.201 192.168.2.255ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.99!ip dhcp pool 192.168.2.0/24network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0default-router 192.168.2.254dns-server 192.168.0.2!!class-map match-all VOICEmatch access-group 100!!policy-map VOICE-POLICYclass VOICEpriority percent 20class class-defaultfair-queue!!interface Multilink1description *** MLPPP Interface ***no ip addressshutdownppp multilinkppp multilink interleaveppp multilink group 1service-policy output VOICE-POLICY!interface MFR1no ip address!interface FastEthernet0/0description INSIDEip address 10.10.0.254 255.255.0.0 secondaryip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0duplex autospeed auto!interface FastEthernet0/1description OUTSIDE_ASE1ip address 192.168.101.2 255.255.255.0duplex autospeed autoservice-policy output VOICE-POLICY!interface Serial0/0/0description OUTSIDE_0no ip addressencapsulation pppshutdownppp multilinkppp multilink group 1!interface Serial0/1/0description OUTSIDE_1no ip addressencapsulation pppshutdownppp multilinkppp multilink group 1!router eigrp 1network 192.168.2.0network 192.168.101.0no auto-summary!ip forward-protocol ndip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.202 permanentip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.101.1!!ip http serverip http authentication localno ip http secure-serverip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000!access-list 100 permit ip host 192.168.2.240 host 192.168.0.240access-list 100 permit ip host 192.168.2.240 host 192.168.0.241!!control-plane!!line con 0password ***logging synchronousloginline aux 0line vty 0 4privilege level 15password ***logging synchronouslogintransport input telnetline vty 5 15privilege level 15password ***logging synchronouslogintransport input telnet!scheduler allocate 20000 1000end
03-19-2015 08:43 AM
It looks like you are running EIGRP between this site and your other site, is that the case ?
If so you need to add a "network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255" statement under your EIGRP configuration so it is also advertised.
Jon
03-19-2015 11:23 AM
I cannot confirm that the other site is using EIGRP, but the other sites (2.x, 101.x) do. Right now, the only address I can successfully ping from the 10.10.0.0/16 is 10.10.0.254.
EDIT: I can confirm after further investigation that the other site is not using EIGRP.
03-19-2015 11:23 AM
So are you saying any 10.10.x.x device cannot ping even the 192.168.2.254 IP on the router ?
Do the 10.10.x.x devices have default gateways set to 10.10.0.254 ?
Jon
04-03-2015 06:17 AM
Allow me to clarify the topology now that I've had some time to dig into it. The 10.10.0.0/16 subnet faces our infrastructure without any sort of gateway. The devices come into our LAN via fiber, which goes into a Dell 2824, which then goes into a WIC on our Cisco 1841. The Dell is set up as a single VLAN, which I suspect is the problem. If we had an open port on the 1841, I would simply bring the 10.10.0.0/16 into its own interface there, but we don't. It has been suggested that we create a second VLAN on the 2824 for the 10.10.0.0/16. I'll likely go that route.
04-03-2015 07:07 AM
Had a quick look at the Dell 2824 and as far as I can tell it is L2 only which means even if you create another vlan it won't route between them.
Perhaps I have misunderstood what you meant ?
Jon
04-03-2015 09:14 AM
We were planning to use a "router on a stick" configuration, something like...
interface FastEthernet0/0
description PLANT_INSIDE
ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 10.10.0.254 255.255.0.0
!
And on the 2824:
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport mode trunk
!
04-03-2015 09:30 AM
Okay that makes sense.
Your configuration may or may not work ie. I have seen it work with some IOS versions and not with others.
Firstly for it to work either way because fa0/0 is not a subinterface you need to make sure the untagged vlan (native vlan in Cisco terminology) on the trunk link is the vlan for the 192.168.2.0/24 subnet.
Otherwise fa0/0 will receive a tagged packet and won't know what to do with it.
Even if you do that I have seen occasions where it doesn't work. So you would need to -
1) create a new subinterface for existing vlan and remove the IP address from the main interface.
2) allocate the IP to the new subinterface and then add the encapsulation command.
If the existing vlan is untagged on the trunk link then it would be -
"encapsulation dot1q <vlan ID> native"
if both vlans are tagged on the trunk link then -
"encapsulation dot1q <vlan ID>"
Like I say it may work if you just ensure the existing vlan ie. the one for 192.168.2.0/24 is untagged on the trunk link.
Apologies if I am telling you things you already know.
Jon
04-03-2015 09:49 AM
Quite the contrary, all of this is new to me. I've worked with firewalling and VPN, but this is uncharted territory... call it on-the-job training, literally. Thanks for your input, and I will report back with my success, or lack thereof.
03-18-2015 03:43 PM
yeah, throw in some more details; you probably have a mismatch in your intervlan routing or even your routing..
maybe start start at your layer 2 and check all the correct vlans are correctly done
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide