06-15-2022 05:28 AM - edited 06-15-2022 05:31 AM
Greetings All,
i need your support urgently
i am working on security systems (CCTV & Others security system) the cameras connected to the core switches(3850) through Industrial Switches (COMNET) , once we connected the Industrial Switches to core switches flapping startes and we cannot ping any another devices
could you support me to solve this issue
06-15-2022 05:36 AM
Hi
Please, share the config from the core switch and the Industrial Switches. And please share a simple topology showing how are you connection everything
06-15-2022 06:29 AM - edited 07-01-2022 05:27 AM
This looks for me spanning tree issue high level, but worh post the logs from Cat 3850., what version of code running on Cat 3850
is this connected port confiured as Trunk or access port ? post that interface config will be helpfull.
06-30-2022 09:57 AM
07-01-2022 05:31 AM
It will be better to share specific port config with both switch side core and industrial.
Suspecting a spanning-tree issue and negotiation issue as well DTP enabled on the switch?
07-01-2022 05:24 AM
I agree with @balaji.bandi that this looks like a spanning tree problem. Are the industrial switches managed or unmanaged? Are there multiple links to the industrial switches and the upstream managed switches? If the answer to that last question is yes, that is your problem.
07-03-2022 03:38 AM
07-03-2022 12:10 AM
07-03-2022 10:05 PM
unable to understand if you have redundant connectivity then why STP is disabled diagram clearly saying ISW 2 are in the loop.
you can better understand STP and config as well from the below URL
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/spanning-tree-protocol/5234-5.html
07-03-2022 10:24 PM - edited 07-03-2022 10:24 PM
because you using VLAN 1 as a default all over, you only have limited options here. (not sure you looking to extend VAN 10 ?)
make one of as bridge priority, so that will be root. and make config changes on other port root guard protection.
07-03-2022 05:27 AM
You have a loop at ISW 2 and the comment on your interfaces of the ISW's says 'no spanning tree'. Would you please elaborate on why you have that in place? You are forcing a loop. There would not be a loop if all the switches were executing spanning tree. ISW 2 would block either the link to ISW 1 or ISW 3 depending on which link was considered the root.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide