11-27-2007 07:46 AM - edited 03-05-2019 07:39 PM
I understand that there is downward compatibilty of 802.1w to support lagacy spanning-tree 802.1D. But I need to verify whether the following setup is valid. I have a 6500 as the RB running RSTP which is linked via a trunk (802.1Q) connection to a C3750 switch, also running RSTP, then from the 3750 I have another trunk (802.1Q)link connected to C3550, this switch is running ieee spanning tree, is the uplink switch (3750) able to deteremin it is a legacy BPDU coming from the 3550 on a trunk link? (both have vlan1 as the native vlan) How will the other non native vlans react on the uplink C3750? Should the vlans be on separate interfaces on the 3750-3550 links for the C3750 to deteremin that each VLAN are connected to legacy ieee spanning tree.
12-04-2007 10:54 AM
The two types of STP protocols are compatible. 802.1w should revert to work with 802.1d bridges.
Switches based on IEEE 802.1d specifications can interoperate successfully with RSTP, IEEE 802.1w, since RSTP retains compatibility with older version of STP. Rapid STP is backwardly compatible with 802.1D and transparent to end users. You can have both protocols enabled on the network.
See this url for documentation on this.
12-04-2007 08:06 PM
As mentioned in other post, RSTP has backward compatibility with CSTP. So your design doesnt seem to bring any issues.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide