cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
496
Views
1
Helpful
3
Replies

disable stack configuration on C1300-24T-4X

Hello, can someone help me out please.

I like to use my new switch like to get rid of the interface naming convention that it has default, I think due to stack settings:

To configure a 1G ethernet switch port I have to do now:

conf t

tester(config)#int GE1/0/1

But i do not use a stack configuration 

did already tried:

conf t

no stack configuration <cr>

restarted the switch but still the same behavior. 

I liked to know, can this behavior changed so that I can use my old Cisco 350 syntax ? see example below:

Conf t 

int GE1 

Many thanks in advance !

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Enes Simnica
Level 5
Level 5

gDay christian.sonnemans@xs4all.nl Alright so, that interface naming is normal on the newer Catalyst platforms, it isn’t from stacking, it’s just how IOS XE labels ports now. gig1/0/1 - the first number refers to slot/module/port. Meaning even if u don’t have a stack or multiple modules, the syntax is fixed. ALso, on older SG/300/350 SMB switches u could just type Gi1..... but on Catalyst/Enterprise switches u can’t change that convention.

There isn’t a CLI command to “shorten” the naming back to the old style, you’ll always need to use gig1/0/1. What you can do is:

  • Use abbreviations:  int gi1/0/1 u only need the unique part.

  • Use range commands: int range gi1/0/1-4 if u want to configure several ports.

So my Cisco friend, as a short answer: it’s expected behavior, not stack-related, and there’s no way to revert to the 350-style syntax.

Hope it helps, and enjoy ur weekend!!!

-Enes

more Cisco?!
more Gym?!



If this post solved your problem, kindly mark it as Accepted Solution. Much appreciated!

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Enes Simnica
Level 5
Level 5

gDay christian.sonnemans@xs4all.nl Alright so, that interface naming is normal on the newer Catalyst platforms, it isn’t from stacking, it’s just how IOS XE labels ports now. gig1/0/1 - the first number refers to slot/module/port. Meaning even if u don’t have a stack or multiple modules, the syntax is fixed. ALso, on older SG/300/350 SMB switches u could just type Gi1..... but on Catalyst/Enterprise switches u can’t change that convention.

There isn’t a CLI command to “shorten” the naming back to the old style, you’ll always need to use gig1/0/1. What you can do is:

  • Use abbreviations:  int gi1/0/1 u only need the unique part.

  • Use range commands: int range gi1/0/1-4 if u want to configure several ports.

So my Cisco friend, as a short answer: it’s expected behavior, not stack-related, and there’s no way to revert to the 350-style syntax.

Hope it helps, and enjoy ur weekend!!!

-Enes

more Cisco?!
more Gym?!



If this post solved your problem, kindly mark it as Accepted Solution. Much appreciated!

WOW! that was quick 

Thank you Enes for responding on my question. And yes it's sounds logic, I only thought that I did something wrong. I just have to get used to this naming convention. Thanks again for your clear explanation and yes I already used abbreviations, also on my 350's.

Have a nice day Enes, you made my day!

Greetings Christian Sonnemans

Enes Simnica
Level 5
Level 5

also read this document: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/campus-lan-switches-access/Catalyst-1200-and-1300-Switches/Admin-Guide/catalyst-1300-admin-guide.pdf

 

more Cisco?!
more Gym?!



If this post solved your problem, kindly mark it as Accepted Solution. Much appreciated!