Hi
I have a strange issue with Access switch & Cisco 6941 phone.
On the switch site I am using cisco 4506 as a access switch & Phone type is 6941.
The access port on the switch is had coded to 100Mbps Full duplex & Phone is on the default configuration.
This is the access switch config
sh run int GigabitEthernet3/7
Building configuration...
interface GigabitEthernet3/7
description ### User port Data and Voice ###
switchport access vlan xxxx
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan xxxx
switchport port-security maximum 4
switchport port-security violation restrict
speed 100
duplex full
no snmp trap link-status
qos trust device cisco-phone
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
spanning-tree guard loop
583090: Jul 4 06:30:46.415 CEST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet3/7 (not half duplex), with SEP5057A8F745FF Port 1 (half duplex).
583101: Jul 4 06:31:46.405 CEST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet3/7 (not half duplex), with SEP5057A8F745FF Port 1 (half duplex).
583112: Jul 4 06:32:46.403 CEST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet3/7 (not half duplex), with SEP5057A8F745FF Port 1 (half duplex).
583123: Jul 4 06:33:46.400 CEST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet3/7 (not half duplex), with SEP5057A8F745FF Port 1 (half duplex).
583134: Jul 4 06:34:46.398 CEST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet3/7 (not half duplex), with SEP5057A8F745FF Port 1 (half duplex).
=================================================
Device ID: SEP5057A8F745FF
Entry address(es):
IP address: x.x.x.x
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 6941 , Capabilities: Host Phone Two-port Mac Relay
Interface: GigabitEthernet3/7, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 169 sec
Second Port Status: Down
Version :
SCCP 9.3.3.2
advertisement version: 2
Duplex: half (Mismatch)
Power drawn: 6.000 Watts
Power request id: 12388, Power management id: 6
Power request levels are:6000 0 0 0 0
Management address(es):
===============================================
Any one have input about the same ??
