cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
13475
Views
8
Helpful
5
Replies

Error log %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0

Dear

 

I have 2 core 4500 with the below config :

Core 1

interface Vlan202
 description VLAN FOR VOICE 
 ip address x.x.x.2 255.255.248.0
 no ip redirects
 ip pim dense-mode
 standby 202 ip x.x.x.1
 standby 202 priority 90
 standby 202 preempt
end

 

core 2

interface Vlan202
 description VLAN FOR VOICE 
 ip address x.x.x.3 255.255.248.0
 no ip redirects
 ip pim dense-mode
 standby 202 ip x.x.x.1

 

I have the bellow error on Bothe core switches :

 

Jan  6 06:27:35.516: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:27:35.520: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:28:00.003: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:28:00.007: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:28:05.535: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:28:05.539: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:28:30.014: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:28:30.018: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:28:35.555: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:28:35.559: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:29:00.026: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:29:00.030: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR
Jan  6 06:29:05.567: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 UP on interface Vlan202
Jan  6 06:29:05.571: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 0.0.0.0 DOWN on interface Vlan202 non DR

 

 

Core1#sho ip pim neighbor
PIM Neighbor Table
Mode: B - Bidir Capable, DR - Designated Router, N - Default DR Priority,
      P - Proxy Capable, S - State Refresh Capable
Neighbor          Interface                Uptime/Expires    Ver   DR
Address                                                            Prio/Mode
x.x.x.3         Vlan202                  6w1d/00:01:43     v2    1 / DR S P
Core1#

 

Core2#sho ip pim neighbor
PIM Neighbor Table
Mode: B - Bidir Capable, DR - Designated Router, N - Default DR Priority,
      P - Proxy Capable, S - State Refresh Capable
Neighbor          Interface                Uptime/Expires    Ver   DR
Address                                                            Prio/Mode
x.x.x.2         Vlan202                  19w4d/00:01:43    v2    1 / S P
Core2#

 

any help on this ?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

You need HSRP Aware PIM for prevent dublicate multicast traffic flow and redundancy.

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

You need HSRP Aware PIM for prevent dublicate multicast traffic flow and redundancy.

Hello

I think I read some where pim-dense doesn't recognise pim designated routers unless igmpv1 is being used and by default pim-dense uses igmpv2

However have you tried manually specifying the DR election?

int xxx
ip pim dr-priority xx ( higher value takes precedence)

 

res

Paul


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Paul Driver - thank you for your help , but it didn't work

Evgeniy Prichinin - thank you it seems this is the solution , I have to upgrade my core to 15.1 then try

for time being I configured the other interface as IP PIM passive

 

 

Did this fix your issue?

 

I was also looking at:

 

access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0

access-list 1 permit any

 

interface X

ip pim neighbor-filter 1

 

Does anybody have a comment on this?

 

Thanks,

Alex

 

Do you have any Nexus and OTV in your network?

 

I had the same msgs.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card