06-16-2013 11:14 PM - edited 03-07-2019 01:55 PM
Hello there.
I was just wondering why the switch fabric in switches are so high (90 Gbps for 2960s, 160 Gbps for 3750x).
Considering a contact center network having the following requirements:
Total IP Call Traffic: 31.552 Mbps (Assuming G.729 and 290 simultaneous phone calls)
Total Data Traffic: 32 Mbps (Assuming 400 users that uses an average of 80kbps)
Overall Traffic: (32 Mbps + 31.552 Mbps)*2 = 127.104 Mbps (duplex)
Isn't it an overkill to use a 2960s which has a switch fabric of 90 Gbps considering only 127.104 Mbps flows in the network?
Are there other considerations why the switches are designed to have high switch fabric specifications?
Thank you.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-17-2013 05:29 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Two reasons for "high" fabric bandwidth. First, Cisco quotes fabric bandwidth as full duplex. (E.g. two full duplex gig ports would have a four gig fabric.)
Second, earlier switch fabrics often didn't support all their ports total aggregate bandwidth. With evolution of hardware, today the often do. This is more about bragging rights than actual need as very few drive all switch ports at their full bandwidth capacities concurrently. (BTW, similar issue with new switches' PPS rating - i.e. they often will handle all ports at line-rate, concurrently.)
06-17-2013 05:29 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Two reasons for "high" fabric bandwidth. First, Cisco quotes fabric bandwidth as full duplex. (E.g. two full duplex gig ports would have a four gig fabric.)
Second, earlier switch fabrics often didn't support all their ports total aggregate bandwidth. With evolution of hardware, today the often do. This is more about bragging rights than actual need as very few drive all switch ports at their full bandwidth capacities concurrently. (BTW, similar issue with new switches' PPS rating - i.e. they often will handle all ports at line-rate, concurrently.)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide