cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
531
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies

IS Pseudowire QoS Transparent?

Mosiur Rahman
Level 1
Level 1

I have configured a Pseudowire L2 Circuit between two vendor device(Device A Cisco ASR1002-X and Device B Mikrotik CCR1036). I want to achieve VLAN and priority transparency. Two Tester is connected with these devices. I am getting VLAN transparent from both end. When tester from Device B sets the VLAN priority, tester from Device A detects it but not the other way around, when Tester from Device A sets VLAN priority, Tester B only detects VLAN with BE priority 0. Kindly find below log for your reference:

 

Device A  Configuration:l2 switching, Other Switching, mpls switchingl2 switching, Other Switching, mpls switching

 

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
mtu 2018
no ip address
load-interval 30
no negotiation auto
service instance 3001 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 3001
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
!
end


 l2vpn vfi context Vz3001
vpn id 3001

 

interface pseudowire3001
neighbor 172.17.1.127 3001
service instance 3001 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 3001

 

bridge-domain 3001
member GigabitEthernet0/0/2 service-instance 3001
member vfi Vz3001
member pseudowire3001

 

Device B configuration:

/interface bridge

add ether-type=0x88a8 name=bridge-Test pvid=3001 vlan-filtering=yes

 

/interface vpls
add advertised-l2mtu=1650 cisco-style=yes cisco-style-id=3001 disabled=no l2mtu=1650 mac-address=02:0C:2F:25:24:02 mtu=1600 name=vpls-Test remote-peer=172.17.1.77

 

/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge-Test interface=vpls-Test
add bridge=bridge-Test interface=sfp1-To-Tester

 

/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes use-ip-firewall-for-vlan=yes

 

Can anyone help me why Tester from device B is not getting the priority?

0 Replies 0
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card