12-22-2016 05:16 PM - edited 03-08-2019 08:41 AM
%C4K_EBM-4-HOSTFLAPPING: Host 3C:A9:F4:65:89:98 in vlan 1 is moving from port Te1/1/1 to port Po1
%C4K_EBM-4-HOSTFLAPPING: STANDBY:Host 3C:A9:F4:65:89:98 in vlan 1 is moving from port Te1/1/1 to port Po1
I see this messages a lot for different devices on Core Switch which is 4500 E pair in VSS.
Core Switch has following config applied:
mac address-table notification mac-move
Is this because of the configuration above all the messages are logged or some kind of loop.
I cannot think of any loop at all as you can see from diagram below
I have not checked every single Mac here but few pointed to scanners which forklift operator will be driving around across area.
SW1(Will have AP's)-Core SWITCH- SW2(Stack in portchannel and will have AP's connected to it)
Thank you.
12-22-2016 05:28 PM
from port Te1/1/1 to port Po1
This means Te 1/1/1 should be part of the etherchannel.
12-22-2016 05:40 PM
Hello Leo,
SW1(2960s) connected with single MMF to Core switch.
So unsure why it needs to be part of Etherchannel.
This is etherchannel config for core switch:
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1 Po1(SU) - Te1/1/16(P) Te2/1/16(P) ---- for network stack.
2 Po2(SU) - Te1/1/15(P) Te2/1/15(P) ---- for client stack
100 Po100(SU) - Te1/1/13(P) Te1/1/14(P) for VSS
101 Po101(SU) - Te2/1/13(P) Te2/1/14(P) for VSS
Below is from Sh Cdp n on core switch
Sw1 Ten 1/1/1 141 S I WS-C2960- Gig 0/1
12-22-2016 05:43 PM
So unsure why it needs to be part of Etherchannel.
Because the host MAC address is seen coming from both interfaces. This could, potentially, mean the host may have been connected to a hub and the hub is spanning different ports/VLANs. Track down where the host is coming from.
12-23-2016 06:10 AM
Hello Leo,
I will check in few days. But there are many messages for different host like this.
We are manufacturing environment.
Some of the hosts are wireless scanner which are sitting on forklifts and move as forklifts travel between different AP's where these AP's could be connected to Sw1 and Sw2 .
Could that be possible?
Also, does is this because of this command that these move are being logged?
mac address-table notification mac-move
Thanks,
I will be able to check again in few days when I get to office.
12-23-2016 01:25 PM
3C:A9:F4:65:89:98
The OUI of the MAC address above is Intel.
Find out what this machine is to determine why.
12-23-2016 03:25 PM
Leo,
Thank you for suggestion. Will try in few days after the break and report .
Merry Christmas!
12-28-2016 12:39 PM
Leo, I found another example:
Dec 28 13:31:34 CST: %C4K_EBM-4-HOSTFLAPPING: Host A4:70:D6:B6:B3:A9 in vlan 1 i s moving from port Te1/1/1 to port Po1 Dec 28 13:31:34 CST: %C4K_EBM-4-HOSTFLAPPING: STANDBY:Host A4:70:D6:B6:B3:A9 in vlan 1 is moving from port Te1/1/1 to port Po1 I tracked this host.
This is android phone. you only connect to Wireless AP's.
So should messages like these be ignored? and result of command in config
mac address-table notification mac-move
And when I take out this from core switch where it is currently applied these messages should go away ?
Thanks
12-29-2016 09:58 AM
Hello
from sw1 are you looping back into the vss in anyway -
It looks like vlan 1 which is default for untagged traffic -
You have stated that switch1 has a single connection back to the vss core so then from thats witch ithere should be no other trunk or port forwarding back to the core
You mentioned Acess points -If they are connected to thats switch have you checked these- Do you have spanning bpdu filtering enabled anywhere?
res
Paul
12-29-2016 03:42 PM
Hello Paul,
As of now we have flat network and yes vlan 1 which is default for untagged traffic
I don't think there is any way to loop back as there is only one link between this 2960 and core switch.
Access point are only connected to:
SW1(2960)(Will have AP's)-----Core SWITCH(4500 in VSS)----SW2(2960xStack in portchannel and will have AP's connected to it)
So When something is read off Ten 1/1/1 on core switch and later on shows up on PO1, only think I can think off is stuff connected to AP's.
I am trying to understand how can there be loop when there is no other way to that from core to sw1. Or can there be?
And this is only happening between these two links and logging in core switch.
I saw another instance today where another cell phone mac got logged in core switch with same message.
What is the purpose for mac notifcation move command?
Is n't this behaviour reflective of the command or I am wrong.
I tried looking on the other switch and this event was not logged.
This event is only logging in core switch which has
mac address-table notification mac-move
applied.
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide