cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1189
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

L3 routing with Catalyst 4900 series.

vghaffari
Level 1
Level 1

Good morning gentlemen,

I have peculiar challenge ahead of me and would like to get new perspectives.

The objective is to route specific VLAN traffic and the caveat is that I have multiple VLANs with the same network address.

For example:

VLAN100 10.10.10.0/28
VLAN101 10.10.11.0/28
VLAN102 10.10.12.0/28

VLAN103 10.10.12.0/28

VLAN104 10.10.11.0/28

I need traffic going from VLAN100 with a destination of 10.10.11.0 forwarded to VLAN101 and NOT VLAN104.

This task is currently being completed by a multi context firewall and we're trying to decommission the asset.

Thanks,

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi Vahid,

You can use VRF lite. You can put vlan 100 and 110 in the same VRF and vlan 104 in a different vrf.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/31sg/configuration/guide/vrf.pdf

HTH

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

Gregory Snipes
Level 4
Level 4

If these networks reuse the same private IP space and have no connection to each other, the only way I can think to have them route correctly to each other is to configure a NAT to translate them out to distinct subnets, then route between the NATed networks.

It'll be very cumbersome with 400+ vlans. If we proceed with NATing... how will it affect the performance of this particular switch (4948-10G).

Is there anyway of grouping VLANs for interVLAN routing?

Thanks,

Hi Vahid,

You can use VRF lite. You can put vlan 100 and 110 in the same VRF and vlan 104 in a different vrf.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/31sg/configuration/guide/vrf.pdf

HTH

Thank you Reza,

Is it possible to policy route (or NAT) specific traffic across the VLAN domains with VRF-lite implementation?

The majority of the routing is done in a VLAN group and occasionally I need to communication with a single node on the other VLAN domain/group.

Hi Vahid,

With VRF lite, you don't have to worry about duplicate ip subnets.  That is actually one of the benefit of VRFs. You can use the same subnet in multiple VRFs.  If you need one vlan group (one vrf) to talk to another vlan group (another vrf), you would need to leak  the vrfs by using import/export.

Here is good document on route leaking between vrfs with examples:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml

HTH

Reza