03-11-2023 09:42 AM
Hello,
On an ISP network, good practice is to switch the backbone to an MTU of 9000 on the access interfaces between the different equipment.
Should we pass the sub-interfaces (VLAN) or access interface that allow to form the IGP with BGP/EIGRP processes by configuring an MTU of 9000 ?
The recommendation would be that the MTU be deployed consistently across the backbone. Agree on that ?
I am going to reproduce a complete lab with 2 ASR 1000 routers and 4 Catalyst 4500 switches with interconnection 1G and 10G link .
Thanks
03-11-2023 09:50 AM
follow
03-11-2023 10:20 AM
@MHM Cisco World Sorry but I thought we would be past that by now (= follow ?)
M.
03-11-2023 10:23 AM
- You may find this thread informative : https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/disadvantages-of-increasing-mtu-router-buffers/td-p/3896463
M.
03-12-2023 08:02 AM
@marce1000 Thanks, but that doesn't really answer my question...
I'm trying to figure out if I should do this :
SW1 Ten1/1---- Ten1/1 SW2 => MTU 9198
This connection between the switches is a trunk port.
Now I connect an ASR router on each switch and use VLAN 11 for BGP, do I also need to configure the switch and router interfaces to 9198 ? The ASR accepts an MTU of 9216.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide