04-05-2013 03:28 AM - edited 03-07-2019 12:39 PM
Hi
One costumer reported us a issue with the multicast traffic. The problem is when they enable igmp snooping the multicast trafic stop to work. He said the problem happened suddenly without any change configuration.
The connectios are these.
core switch ---> port channel 3 ---> access switch ----> gi 0/42-----> client
access switch ----> port channel 1 ---->core switch.
IP multicast traffic 239.228.41.23
VLAN ID: 227
The Core uses pim sparse mode and the RP is its loopback interface.
Core routes multicast correctly to vlan
(*, 239.228.41.23), 1d23h/00:02:45, RP 172.16.100.25, flags: SJC
Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
Outgoing interface list:
Vlan227, Forward/Sparse, 1d23h/00:02:45
Core routes multicast in L2 to Port channel 3.
core#show mac address-table multicast vlan 227 igmp-snooping
vlan mac address type learn qos ports
-----+---------------+--------+-----+---+-------------------------------
-----+---------------+--------+-----+---+-
227 0100.5e64.2917 static Yes - Router,Po3,Po29
Switch Access has igmp snooping enable.
switch#sh ip igmp snooping vlan 227 Global IGMP Snooping configuration:
-------------------------------------------
IGMP snooping : Enabled
IGMPv3 snooping (minimal) : Enabled
Report suppression : Enabled
TCN solicit query : Disabled
TCN flood query count : 2
Robustness variable : 2
Last member query count : 2
Last member query interval : 1000
Vlan 227:
--------
IGMP snooping : Enabled
IGMPv2 immediate leave : Disabled
Multicast router learning mode : pim-dvmrp
CGMP interoperability mode : IGMP_ONLY
Robustness variable : 2
Last member query count : 2
Last member query interval : 1000
Swtich access detects the igmp trafic and asosciates the ports to the groups properly.
switch#sh ip igmp snooping groups
Vlan Group Type Version Port List
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
227 239.228.41.23 igmp v2 Gi0/42, Po1
Switch access has mroute port
switch#sh ip igmp snooping mrouter
Vlan ports
---- -----
227 Po1(dynamic)
But mac address table multicast in switch access is empty.
swtich#show mac address-table multicast vlan 227
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- ---- -----
May be this is the cause of the problem.
But. I don't know why the switch is not filling in the mac table if it konws all information.
Any idea?
Thank you.
Best regards.
04-09-2013 12:25 AM
We have introduced manually the address to the mac address table. Example
mac-address-table static 0100.5e64.2917 vlan 227 interface gi 0/42 po 1
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- ---- -----
227 0100.5e64.2917 USER Gi0/42 Po1
No work neither.
04-09-2013 12:56 AM
Hello Waldo
Usually igmp is enabled by default on most cisco devices so where have you enabled snooping? (version3)
Also I can see DVMRP learning, so was snooping enabled on a non cisco M/C device?
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
04-09-2013 01:05 AM
Hello PDriver
Usually igmp is enabled by default on most cisco devices so where have you enabled snooping? (version3)
Also I can see DVMRP learning, so was snooping enabled on a non cisco M/C device?
On the core and access switch.
If I disable igmp snooping, everything work fine.
But I don't undertand why if the access switch asociate the port 0/42 (where the client is connected) to the correct multicast group and multicast flow doesn't reach this port.
The costumer wants igmp enable, and he said everything worked and suddenly stoped to work.
Both devices are Cisco.
Thank you.
Best Regards
04-09-2013 01:20 AM
Hello
For sparse mode? (static/auto/bsr/anycast)
If its just between these two devices then staitc RP would be fine - using ip pim rp-address
and of course have a routed path to the RP or in your case the loopback on the core.
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
04-09-2013 01:38 AM
Hi
Yes is static sparse mode with rp-address interface loopback on the core.
But I didn't check the conectivity between the client vlan to that interface loopback. I will.
Edit: Yes threre is ping from the client/switch and the RP point.
We goona try to reload the access switches (may be we should've done this at the begining )
I will update the information.
Thank you
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide