Nexus 5548 and Routing
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2011 11:14 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:53 AM
Hello
I plan to implement a Nexus 5548UP with routing option as backbone/datacenter switch in small 10 Giga network. For any time I heard there are some problems with the Routing of clients segments. Some features are not supported like on the catalyst products. I check the features on the Nexus and I don't believe there is now a problem for client segments.
Does anyone have experience with the nexus 5548 as backbone router?
regards
Pascal
- Labels:
-
Other Switches
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2011 11:38 AM
Pascal,
In order to do layer-3 on the Nexus 5K, you need to buy a layer-3 doughtier card. As for layer-3 features, here are all the ones that are supported:
• Support for up to 8000 prefixes and up to 8000 host entries
• Support for up to 2000 multicast routes
• Support for 1000 VRF entries
• Support for up to 4096 VLANs
• 16-way equal-cost multipathing (ECMP)
• 2000 ingress and 1000 egress access control list (ACL) entries
• Hot-Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) and Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
• ACL: Routed ACL with Layer 3 and 4 options to match ingress and egress ACL
• Virtual Route Forwarding (VRF): VRF-lite (IP VPN); VRF-aware unicast; and BGP-, OSPF-, RIP-, and VRF-aware multicast
• Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRFP) with ACL; strict and loose modes
• Jumbo frame support (up to 9216 bytes)
for more info have a look at the data sheet
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/data_sheet_c78-618603.html
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2011 12:32 PM
If you can live with 160G routing, you should be fine.
The only thing is N5K is not possition as a core router because is cannot expand.
Regards,
jerry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-26-2011 04:59 AM
Hi Jerry
Do you have experience with Nexus 5548 as core-switch?
Regards
Pascal
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-26-2011 06:11 AM
I personally don't. My customers are pretty big and they all use N7Ks.
If N5K fits your need, it should be okay.
Regards,
jerry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-08-2011 07:58 PM
Can any one tell me if above mentioned 5548UP or P does support IPv6 ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-08-2011 08:14 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-06-2012 04:55 AM
Hi friends,
I'm planning a network for a new building and have to take de decision for the core. I will be very happy if I can unify LAN and SAN. But can I do that with a reasonable cost?
I'm ok with 160G routing speed.
should I buy two 4506 (plus 5548 for servers) instead of two 5548 (plus some 2200 maybe) for the core of mi network?
I miss something using 5548?
300 PC
200 PoIP phones
250 IP cameras at 1Mbps
6 racks for access switches
3 all new racks will be stacks of 2960S
3 racks filled with 2960TT. Maybe routed using existent 3650/3750
Q: Can I connect the 37502960S stacks to both nexus using an etherchannel (vPC)?
Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-06-2012 06:11 AM
Hi,
Yes, you can do that. You can have any switch connected to Nexus in a VPC mode.
As your setup is a small one, you can use 2x 5548 with L3 daughter cards on them. With L3 daugther card, Nexus 5500 supports upto 8 FEX's in cross-connect mode or 16 FEX's in straight through mode. For your set up it should be OK.
I would not use a stack of 3750 or 2960S's a TOR of the switch as the Nexus architecture gives me more flexibility with N2K. The Nexus 2K's with N5K give me a single point of config, management, code upgrade, troubleshooting and investement protecttion.
I would suggest to use Cat4500 for the Campus/User access deployment for POE requirement. Neuxs 2K's do not support POE as they are being primarily targetted only for TOR switch.
Let us know if you have any doubts.
Cheers,
-amit singh
