01-17-2022 06:22 AM - edited 01-17-2022 06:23 AM
Hello all,
we have a 100G vPC Peer-Link between two Nexus N9k-C93240XC-FX2.
tried to connect Eth1/59 and Eth1/60 per QSFP-100G-CU1M DAC cable, but only Port 60 get link.
cable has been correct recognized by both nexuses (show interface status/ show int transceiver detail)
when we use instead of 2x DACs , a 1x DAC and 2x 100G-LR4 SFPs at Ports 59/60 - we get link
when using Ports 58 + 60 - we get link
NX-OS 9.3(8)
tried to Factory Default both switches - no go
swapped one of the DACs with the QSFP+ Setup ( which is ok) and crossed the DACs with each other to exclude a defect.
Any suggestions on how to resolve this or is this in general accepted by specs ?
Regards
Boris
01-17-2022 09:32 AM
what is the status if you only connect port 59 ?
can you post snippet config ?
01-26-2022 03:00 AM - edited 02-01-2022 12:13 AM
l do believe this is port-channel issue , but not sure where the problem is:
- If only port 60 is connected -> works
- If only port 59 is connected -> no link
switch1
`show port-channel summary`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports Channel--------------------------------------------------------------------------------123 Po123(SU) Eth LACP Eth1/59(D) Eth1/60(P)
List of Configured Port-Channels:+-------------------+-----------------------+| Port-Channel Name | Members |+-------------------+-----------------------+| Po123(SU) | Eth1/59(D),Eth1/60(P) |+-------------------+-----------------------+
switch2
`show port-channel summary`
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports
Channel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123 Po123(SU) Eth LACP Eth1/59(D) Eth1/60(P)
List of Configured Port-Channels:+-------------------+-----------------------+| Port-Channel Name | Members |+-------------------+-----------------------+| Po123(SU) | Eth1/59(D),Eth1/60(P) |+-------------------+-----------------------+
snippet config of ports eth1/59 and 1/60 on switch 1:
Ethernet1/59 transceiver is present type is QSFP-100G-CR4 revision is A nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec Link length supported for copper is 1 m cisco product id is QSFP-100G-CU1M Ethernet1/60 transceiver is present type is QSFP-100G-CR4 nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec Link length supported for copper is 1 m cisco product id is QSFP-100G-CU1M interface Ethernet1/59 switchport switchport mode trunk channel-group 123 mode active no sh interface Ethernet1/60 switchport switchport mode trunk channel-group 123 mode active no sh
snippet config of ports eth1/59 and 1/60 on switch 2:
Ethernet1/59 transceiver is present type is QSFP-100G-CR4 nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec Link length supported for copper is 1 m cisco product id is QSFP-100G-CU1M Ethernet1/60 transceiver is present type is QSFP-100G-CR4 nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec Link length supported for copper is 1 m cisco product id is QSFP-100G-CU1M \ interface Ethernet1/59 description vPC switchport switchport mode trunk channel-group 123 mode active no shutdown interface Ethernet1/60 description vPC switchport switchport mode trunk channel-group 123 mode active no shutdown
01-31-2022 11:52 PM - edited 02-01-2022 12:04 AM
just noticed alert healthcheck for the below config, what would be the error here ?
- If only port 60 is connected -> works
- If only port 59 is connected -> no link
02-01-2022 12:51 AM
Hello,
post the output of:
show port-channel compatibility-parameters
debug port-channel error
The command:
channel-group 123 force
used to be around, not sure if that is available on the N9K, but if it is, give that a try:
interface Ethernet1/59
--> channel-group 123 force
02-02-2022 01:18 AM
Hi,
see attached output of show port-channel compatibility-parameters for sw1 and sw2
the channel is a full trunk with all VLANs allowed on it.
sh int po123 trunk
Port Native Status Port Vlan Channel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Po123 1 trunking -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Port Vlans Allowed on Trunk -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Po123 1-4094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Port Vlans Err-disabled on Trunk -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Po123 none -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Port STP Forwarding -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Po123 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Po123 Feature VTP is not enabled
debug is enabled when I try the „force“ command on Port Eth1/59 I get the following output:
Switch 1:
eth_port_channel: eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_begin(3367): MTS_OPC_DME_TX_BEGIN for txid=1190199 eth_port_channel: pcm_get_txn_info_entry(3802): Unable to find TXN INfo for TXN ID 1190199 eth_port_channel: pcm_demux(1066): (1066): (Warning) unexpected mts msg (opcode - 409604) eth_port_channel: pcm_dme_membership_update_handler(2778): Incremented dme_gwrap_ref_count to 1 for txid:1190199, opc:MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: pcm_pc_ac_membership_change(1648): found the mbr 0x1a007600 eth_port_channel: pcm_pc_ac_membership_change(1648): found the mbr 0x1a007400 eth_port_channel: pcm_perform_pre_drop_action_per_lock(1668): No pre-drop needed for non-PC rid, type 6 eth_port_channel: pcm_pss_save_data(926): unknown type being stored to pss ffffffff eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2013): Decremented dme_gwrap_ref_count to 0 for txid:1190199, opc:MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2083): TXN END NOT rxed for 1190199 updating evseq ended eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2091): setting evseq_end to true in pcm_wrap_send_response for opc MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_end(3431): eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_end: sending response from tx_end for txid 1190199
Switch 2:
eth_port_channel: eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_begin(3367): MTS_OPC_DME_TX_BEGIN for txid=1192193 eth_port_channel: pcm_get_txn_info_entry(3802): Unable to find TXN INfo for TXN ID 1192193 eth_port_channel: pcm_demux(1066): (1066): (Warning) unexpected mts msg (opcode - 409604) eth_port_channel: pcm_dme_membership_update_handler(2778): Incremented dme_gwrap_ref_count to 1 for txid:1192193, opc:MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: pcm_pc_ac_membership_change(1648): found the mbr 0x1a007600 eth_port_channel: pcm_pc_ac_membership_change(1648): found the mbr 0x1a007400 eth_port_channel: pcm_perform_pre_drop_action_per_lock(1668): No pre-drop needed for non-PC rid, type 6 eth_port_channel: pcm_pss_save_data(926): unknown type being stored to pss ffffffff eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2013): Decremented dme_gwrap_ref_count to 0 for txid:1192193, opc:MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2083): TXN END NOT rxed for 1192193 updating evseq ended eth_port_channel: pcm_wrap_send_response(2091): setting evseq_end to true in pcm_wrap_send_response for opc MTS_OPC_MODIFY_ImPcRsMbrIfsPolicyelem eth_port_channel: eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_end(3431): eth_pcm_objstore_process_tx_end: sending response from tx_end for txid 1192193
But still:
Port Eth1/59 stays down and does not join the Channel.
# sh port-c sum Flags: D - Down P - Up in port-channel (members) I - Individual H - Hot-standby (LACP only) s - Suspended r - Module-removed b - BFD Session Wait S - Switched R - Routed U - Up (port-channel) p - Up in delay-lacp mode (member) M - Not in use. Min-links not met -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports Channel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 123 Po123(SU) Eth LACP Eth1/59(D) Eth1/60(P)
Regards
05-13-2022 12:41 PM
Every time I have an issue with a DAC cable on a Nexus device manually setting the speed parameter on the port seems to resolve the issue for me. So for your 100G DAC it would be adding the line "speed 1000000" for port eth 1/59.
05-16-2022 12:44 AM
thanks for reply, we did replace hardware!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide