09-15-2012 01:46 AM - edited 03-07-2019 08:54 AM
Hi all,
I'm distributing ospf to eigrp (onto a MPLS WAN) via a cisco asa 5510 vers 8.2.5.
In short everything is generally ok but I am getting classfull networks redistributed from the ASA into the eigrp AS.
Heres an extract of the config if someone could scan:
access-list OSPFtoEIGRP standard permit 172.17.x.x 255.255.255.252
access-list OSPFtoEIGRP standard permit 10.0.x.x 255.255.252.0
access-list OSPFtoEIGRP standard permit 10.0.x.x 255.255.252.0
access-list OSPFtoEIGRP standard permit 10.0.x.x 255.255.248.0
access-list OSPFtoEIGRP standard permit 10.0.x.x 255.255.240.0
access-list EIGRPtoOSPF standard permit 10.x.x.0 255.255.255.192
access-list EIGRPtoOSPF standard permit 10.x.x.128 255.255.255.240
access-list EIGRPtoOSPF standard permit 10.x.x.144 255.255.255.240
access-list EIGRPtoOSPF standard permit 10.x.x.192 255.255.255.192
route-map EIGRPtoOSPF permit 10
match ip address EIGRPtoOSPF
!
route-map OSPFtoEIGRP permit 10
match ip address OSPFtoEIGRP
router eigrp 9
no auto-summary
distribute-list OSPFtoEIGRP out ospf 100
distribute-list EIGRPtoOSPF in interface Outside
eigrp router-id 172.x.x.x
network 172.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
passive-interface Inside
redistribute ospf 100 metric 1000000 100 255 1 1500 route-map OSPFtoEIGRP
Heres the troublesome routes being distributed.
show eigrp top output:
P 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0, 1 successors, FD is 28160
via Redistributed (28160/0)
P 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0, 1 successors, FD is 28160
via Redistributed (28160/0)
The rest of the sh eigrp top looks good and is redistributing the required routes within net 10 etc.
Any help would be appreciated.
regards
Ben
09-15-2012 10:37 AM
Hi,
Have you tried clearing the EIGRP process?
clear eigrp pid 9
HTH
09-15-2012 01:18 PM
Hi Reza - Thanks for the response - The ASA lets me clear the route within the process via:
clear eigrp 9 topology 10.0.0.0
but no clear eigrp pid 9 or clear eigrp 9.
I have also shut - no shut the interface to complete a hard reset for the adjacency in addition to
clear eigrp 9 neighbors outside which also results in the same issue being present.
think it's time to look at caveats on the IOS.
Best regards
Ben
09-15-2012 02:26 PM
I'm not sure that it may help but, "no auto-summary" in the ospf routing process.
09-17-2012 02:19 AM
Thanks for the suggestion Oliver. OSPF is default as no auto-summary hence I'm unable to enter the command.
I've upgraded the IOS on the ASA now and I still see the same issue? Must be somewhere in my config I think. At least I hope so.
regards
Ben
09-17-2012 01:58 PM
From the show ip eigrp top output, you see that the routes are redistributed from OSPF, so I think the problem comes from the filtering.
I don't really get the reason why you filter using the route-map in the redistribute command and you filter using distribute list in the same time. The both call the same ACL (OSPFtoEIGRP) but there are used in 2 different directions (OSPF--> EIGRP via redistribute command and EIGRP-->OSPF via distribute list).
Maybe you're mix the direction of your distribute-list with the name of your ACLs : distribute out should use EIGRPtoOSPF (you're filtering the update send to OSPF process) and distribute in should use OSPFtoEIGRP.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide