10-12-2007 01:29 AM - edited 03-05-2019 07:02 PM
I am trying to create a pagp channel between a 6509 & 4507 switch. The ports on the 4507 keep error disabling with the following error:
%PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Gi1/6, putting Gi1/6 in err-disable state
Catalyst 4507 Config
interface Port-channel2
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet1/6
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,408-410,413,430,436,437,446,452,453
switchport mode trunk
udld port
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
Catlayst 6509 config
Channel
Module Protocol
------- --------
1 PAGP
2 PAGP
3 PAGP
4 LACP
5 PAGP
7 PAGP
8 PAGP
set port channel 2/10-11 2
Ports on both switches are set to desirable non silent.
Any ideas why the ports keep shutting down.
Thanks.
10-12-2007 06:39 AM
Make sure G1/6 matches exactly whatever the config is on your other port for the etherchannel , this includes things like speed and duplex on the ports . I don't see where on g1/6 it says non-silent like you are saying they are , I think it is silent by default unless you specify non-silent. Should read channel-group 2 mode desirable non-silent" .
10-12-2007 08:30 AM
Hi thanks for your reply.
I now have a slightly different problem. I have two port channels and one port in each channel is showing connected and the other is suspended. I get the following error messages
011198: Oct 12 15:59:09: FEC: pagp_switch_set_gcchange: GC change req Gi1/5
011199: Oct 12 15:59:09: %EC-5-DONTBNDL: Gi1/5 suspended: incompatible partner port with
GigabitEthernet1/6
011200: Oct 12 15:59:09: FEC: pagp_switch_set_gcchange: GC change req Gi1/4
011201: Oct 12 15:59:09: %EC-5-DONTBNDL: Gi1/4 suspended: incompatible partner port with GigabitEthernet1/3
011202: Oct 12 15:59:09: FEC: pagp_switch_set_gcchange: GC change req Gi1/5
My port configs are below and I cannot see anything obvious that differs between the ports.
interface Port-channel1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface Port-channel2
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/3
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
udld port
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode desirable non-silent
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/4
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
udld port
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode desirable non-silent
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
udld port
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable non-silent
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/6
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
udld port
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable non-silent
!
Have you any further ideas.
Thanks in advance.
10-12-2007 10:08 AM
I would check your 6509 cards , we ran into something like this awhile ago and it ended up being some restriction on the cards on what you etherchannel due to bandwidth restrictions on the card itself I believe . I think the problem was with either a 6348 or a 6548 card. Config wise normally what you have looks right . Maybe you can see something from this doc, http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/31sg/configuration/guide/channel.html#wp1020420
Also use the show port capabilities on the 6500 ports to see if you can bundle the ones you want .
10-12-2007 11:42 AM
It is a 6416 fibre gbic module that is being used on the 6509.
The show port capabilites command shows that it supports channeling. It is ports 2/10 & 2/11 on each of the 6509 switches that I am connecting to.
The following is taken from the 6509 config.
set port channel 2/9-12 38
I am using the set port channel 2/10-11 mode desirable command to configure the channel.
Oddly when I do a show port channel command ports 2/10 & 2/11 do not show up as channel (other channels to 6509 & VMWare servers are shown in this list). I expected to see them there. A show port command shows both ports as connected and trunking on the 6509 and one connected & one suspended on the 4507.
Any ideas what I am missing?
Thanks.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide