06-29-2016 05:12 AM - edited 03-08-2019 06:25 AM
Dear friends,
I am facing a problem with one of our Catalyst 4507 and a line card refusing to power devices through PoE.
Regarding the technical data, this is the setup of the switch:
Switch# show module
Chassis Type : WS-C4507R
Power consumed by backplane : 40 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------
1 6 Sup V-10GE 10GE (X2), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X4516-10GE JAE1118FMYP
3 24 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4424-GB-RJ45 JAB072805CF
4 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45)V, Cisco/IEEE WS-X4548-GB-RJ45V JAE1134URO9
5 24 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4424-GB-RJ45 JAB072805AW
6 48 10/100BaseTX (RJ45) WS-X4148-RJ JAE04261QNQ
7 18 1000BaseX (GBIC) WS-X4418-GB JAE063808EW
M MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
--+--------------------------------+---+------------+----------------+---------
1 000d.29d4.b280 to 000d.29d4.b285 3.4 12.2(31r)SGA 15.0(2)SG10 Ok
3 000c.ce7e.7710 to 000c.ce7e.7727 1.5 Ok
4 001d.4554.2ee0 to 001d.4554.2f0f 3.3 Ok
5 000c.ce7e.7860 to 000c.ce7e.7877 1.5 Ok
6 0002.b94f.d2f0 to 0002.b94f.d31f 2.3 Ok
7 0008.e37a.ba1e to 0008.e37a.ba2f 1.1 Ok
Mod Redundancy role Operating mode Redundancy status
----+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------------------
1 Active Supervisor SSO Active
Switch# show power
Power Fan Inline
Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status
------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- -------
PS1 PWR-C45-2800AC AC 2800W good good good
PS2 PWR-C45-2800AC AC 2800W good good good
Power supplies needed by system : 1
Power supplies currently available : 2
Power Summary Maximum
(in Watts) Used Available
---------------------- ---- ---------
System Power (12V) 561 1360
Inline Power (-50V) 17 1400
Backplane Power (3.3V) 40 40
---------------------- ---- ---------
Total 618 2800
The switch is running Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SG10.
We are facing PoE issues on the module 4 (WS-X4548-GB-RJ45V). Even with a factory default configuration, the module does not power up any device connected to ports Gi4/1 - Gi4/12, and to ports Gi4/25 - Gi4/36. The remaining ports appear to be providing power correctly. Approximately every 15 minutes, the following console message appears:
%C4K_CHASSIS-5-POEHEALTHCHECKFAILED: Poe Health Check failed on slot 4 (count = 1)
As far as data communication is concerned, all ports appear to be communicating normally, so the issue is limited strictly to PoE.
The following (abbreviated) output is interesting:
Switch# show power inline
Available:1400(w) Used:17(w) Remaining:1383(w)
Interface Admin Oper Power(Watts) Device Class
From PS To Device
--------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- -----
Gi4/1 auto on 17.3 15.4 Cisco PD n/a
Gi4/2 auto off 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a
Both ports shown are connected to devices that do not come up even though they are supposed to be powered through PoE. Gi4/1 connects to an Aironet AP (1230 series). This AP is not really powered up even though the output claims otherwise. Gi4/2 connects to a Cisco 7970 IP phone series. This phone is not powered up and not even detected as a PoE device in the output above.
Configuring static PoE settings on the affected ports does not help, and the fact that they fail in sets of 12 (1-12 are unpowered, 13-24 are powered, 25-36 are unpowered, 37-48 are powered) unfortunately suggests that this can be a hardware problem.
In any case, does anyone have any suggestion? Thank you very much in advance!
Best regards,
Peter
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-29-2016 05:59 AM
Hi Peter
unfortunately looking at what you have posted and when I check that alert in the docs it does look like maybe a hardware module issue as you suggested as you see it every 15minutes or so and below the odd time seems ok but continuously that's an issue with hardware
Error Message C4K_CHASSIS-5-POEHEALTHCHECKFAILED: Poe Health Check failed on slot [dec] (count = [dec])
Explanation The PoE health check has failed on a module. The PoE service provided by the module may be unavailable.
Recommended Action If the message shows up rarely and coincides with external events such as input power supplies being changed, this message can be safely ignored. If the message shows up continuously, please contact your Cisco representative for a replacement of the PoE switching module.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12-2/46sg/system/messages/emsgbk/emsg.html
06-29-2016 08:03 AM
Hi Peter,
Hope you are well!
I agree with you and Mark that this is a hardware issue. Unfortunately, I don't think there is much you can do with it except opening a ticket with TAC and RMA the module.
BTW, is the chassis running cool enough?
Thanks,
Reza
06-29-2016 05:59 AM
Hi Peter
unfortunately looking at what you have posted and when I check that alert in the docs it does look like maybe a hardware module issue as you suggested as you see it every 15minutes or so and below the odd time seems ok but continuously that's an issue with hardware
Error Message C4K_CHASSIS-5-POEHEALTHCHECKFAILED: Poe Health Check failed on slot [dec] (count = [dec])
Explanation The PoE health check has failed on a module. The PoE service provided by the module may be unavailable.
Recommended Action If the message shows up rarely and coincides with external events such as input power supplies being changed, this message can be safely ignored. If the message shows up continuously, please contact your Cisco representative for a replacement of the PoE switching module.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12-2/46sg/system/messages/emsgbk/emsg.html
06-29-2016 08:03 AM
Hi Peter,
Hope you are well!
I agree with you and Mark that this is a hardware issue. Unfortunately, I don't think there is much you can do with it except opening a ticket with TAC and RMA the module.
BTW, is the chassis running cool enough?
Thanks,
Reza
06-30-2016 04:22 AM
Hi Mark, Reza,
Reza: I am well, thanks! Happy to be back here, and looking forward to meeting you at CLUS :)
Guys, thank you. It really appears that this is a hardware issue. Unfortunately, RMA is not an option because this is a refurbished line card we have purchased for a relatively negligible price, so I guess this is the risk that comes with it.
Best regards,
Peter
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide